CleanCapital secures $300 million commitment from Manulife Investment Management, acquires 63 megawatts of operating solar projects
Experts Only Podcast #86: The 2021 Sustainable Energy in America Factbook with Lisa Jacobson & Ethan Zindler [av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/podcast-image-pageheader2.jpg’ attachment=’4329′ attachment_size=’full’ copyright=” caption=” styling=” align=’center’ font_size=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ animation=’no-animation’ hover=” appearance=” link=” target=” title_attr=” alt_attr=” id=” custom_class=” av_element_hidden_in_editor=’0′ av_uid=’av-jwwgyb48′ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image] [av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’20’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”] [av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgxszg’ admin_preview_bg=”] Episode 86: The 2021 Sustainable Energy in America Factbook with Lisa Jacobson & Ethan Zindler [/av_textblock] [av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’10’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”] [av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwl4lsb2′ admin_preview_bg=”] Host Jon Powers was thrilled to welcome back Lisa Jacobson, President of the Business Council for Sustainable Energy (BCSE), and Ethan Zindler, Head of Americas for BloombergNEF, for their third annual conversation about the Sustainability in America 2021 Factbook. Learn from the experts about the revolution in US clean energy production as described in the ninth version of this important resource. Hear about their research into the trends they’re seeing in the industry in production, transportation, decarbonization, energy efficiency, and jobs. The trends are showing we have a fundamentally strong industry and marketplace. [/av_textblock] [av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’20’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”] [av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwh5253′ admin_preview_bg=”] Listen now: [/av_textblock] [av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’20’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-k4so2umi’ admin_preview_bg=”] [av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ExpertsOnly-bar-BCSE-BNEF-2021-1030×258.jpg’ attachment=’8028′ attachment_size=’large’ copyright=” caption=” styling=” align=’center’ font_size=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ animation=’no-animation’ hover=” appearance=” link=’manually,https://soundcloud.com/experts-only/episode-86-the-2021-sustainable-energy-in-america-factbook-with-lisa-jacobson-ethan-zindler’ target=’_blank’ title_attr=” alt_attr=” lazy_loading=’disabled’ id=” custom_class=” av_element_hidden_in_editor=’0′ av_uid=’av-k37p0z0j’ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image] [av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-khmlvb58′ admin_preview_bg=”] Transcript [/av_textblock] [av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-kh7u1yig’ admin_preview_bg=”] Jon: Lisa and Ethan, thanks so much for joining me. Ethan: Thank you. Lisa: Thanks for having us. Jon: Yeah. And so this is our third handled coverage of the Factbook. Lisa, I was hoping you could just step back for a second and talk about just the history of the Factbook, what it is briefly and what you guys have seen it do as a tool for the industry. Lisa: Well, Jon, thank you so much again for inviting the business council for sustainable energy and BloombergNEF to share the findings of the 2021 sustainable energy in America Factbook, we are in our ninth edition. I find that staggering but also really exciting for what you’re hoping I’ll explain. I mean, we started the Factbook again almost 10 years ago, knowing across the sectors that BCSC works with, so that’s energy efficiency, natural gas, renewable energy, energy storage, sustainable transportation. We knew we were on the cusp of some very significant changes, but we didn’t really have an accessible resource that put it all together. And again, did it in a way that both our industries could understand, but also policy makers. We wanted policy makers to understand. Lisa: So we didn’t really know where the data would go and where the markets would go when we started. But we did a 10 year retrospective with the 2020 Factbook and we found significant structural changes in our energy economy. And we saw energy efficiency, renewable energy, natural gas, new sustainable transportation technologies really dominating the energy economy in the United States. And we’re getting very significant benefits. So we wanted a factual historical review of what’s happening in the marketplace. Lisa: We wanted to look at US energy as a whole, but then we also wanted to look at areas where we might have, right now relatively small deployment in technology, but we think that they are poised for growth. So we wanted to have it again a factual base record of a transformation that might occur going into the future. So it’s very practical and it’s meant to be a foundational resource for policy makers and certainly industry and other stakeholders that might be interested in understanding US energy markets. Jon: You can actually access it from a link when the podcast is hosted for all the folks in the audience. But Lisa, for folks that aren’t familiar with the business council for sustainable energy, and you guys are a rockstar organization. Can you talk for a second about what you guys do? Lisa: Thank you for that. Yes. The business council for sustainable energy is a policy advocacy coalition. We represent companies and trade associations in the sectors I just mentioned, so renewable energy, energy efficiency, natural gas, transportation, storage and we come together to focus largely on commercially available technology, and putting forth policies that will deploy us cost effectively and quickly and increasingly to look at what the scientific community is telling us we need to do with regard to climate change. How do we get on pace with the trajectories to reduce emissions and also prepare our economy for the impacts of climate change. So addressing resilience and adaptation too Jon: Excellent. And then Ethan, Bloomberg New Energy Finance. You’re the head of Americas. You guys are really the go-to… We’re talking about a Factbook, you guys have the data and have been able to put these facts together for a decade now, but for folks that are not familiar with BNEF, can you talk for a second about what you all do? Ethan: Sure. So BloombergNEF is a division of BloombergL.P. which is the financial information provider pretty well known, obviously news division as well, but we were about a 250 person unit within the much larger company that just focuses on what we would call the energy transition. But we also look at other areas where, of the economy now that are transitioning to lower carbon technologies and investment includes materials, and includes we would call it the circular economy overall and includes industry. And we’re also starting to look a bit at agriculture as well. But basically now we do fundamental research on this entire transition towards a lower carbon economy. Jon: So I think Lisa, you mentioned this last time we talked, it was last year’s Factbook and it was looking back over the last decades, and some of the fundamental changes that have happened leading to a really fundamentally strong marketplace, but obviously 2020 was a transformational year on so many levels for the economy. Maybe Ethan, you can talk for a second about some of the shifts that we saw, both in transportation and how our electricity and where electricity was being delivered, and in any thoughts on any of those shifts are here to stay or we sort of revert back to status quo up to those changes. Ethan: So I was joking with Lisa when we finished the project this year. Last year was useful cause it was the end of a decade, and we looked back over 10 years of all this extraordinary change and decarbonisation and transition and whatever. And I kind of thought, okay, well, 2020 it’s going to be kind of more of the same, but it’ll be incremental. Little did we know it was going to be the weirdest year in… I mean, literally one of the weirdest years in history, and it had all kinds of major ramifications, as you might imagine for the energy sector. Ethan: Total energy consumption in the US bar estimate was down by about 8% last year. So, that’s a huge decline bigger than we even saw during years like the great recession. But the decline was not even in particular use of energy around transportation, as you might imagine, was down the most, which is 14 and a half percent. And that was largely because at certain points of view, no one traveled at all on airplanes, almost at all at all. Jon: I haven’t been in an airplane in a year Ethan: Exactly me too, what I wouldn’t do to get on an airplane and get some peanuts. But the electricity segment of our use of energy actually only went down by about 4%. And that is probably not even that surprising because look, I’m not sitting here talking to you at my office, but I am here at home and we’re using a lot more electricity during the week here at home than we would have. So the residential segment basically helped to offset the declines in some of the other segments overall in terms of electricity, but overall energy usage was down. And that had all kinds of ramifications really across the whole energy sector. Jon: Interesting. And we did see a shift, continued shift Lisa in terms of generation. So, I love the fact actually in here that coal plants slipped to 19% from 45% a decade ago. And there’s so many factors that led to that shift, but we’ve seen a growth in renewables or growth in natural gas production. What are some of the continued trends that we’re seeing in the generation side that we hope to continue here in 2021? Lisa: Well, I mean, I’m sure Ethan will want to comment on this too, but let’s just look at renewables. I mean, we’re talking record setting year, nearly 34 gigawatts built, this is 50% above the previous annual record year. And when you look at where renewable sit with other generation in our mix, it’s basically tied with nuclear and… Lisa: Yeah, one fifth of our power generation in the country last year. So in a very challenging year where we basically had a very chaotic, at least a couple of months for large scale, renewable energy projects, we still had this tremendous growth. And some of it may be in just the policy uncertainty with tax credits and kind of a previous year or two ramp up. But I think it shows overall the bigger trend is that this is what customers want and it’s cost effective. Lisa: And I think that’s a structural change. We also have built in many years and continued investment in energy efficiency, while the energy efficiency picture for 2020 was a very unusual, basically our energy productivity rose, which normally would be a very good sign. It rose significantly, but it rose mostly due to economic contraction and as Ethan was saying the changes in the way we used energy. Lisa: So even though we had this positive metric if you look under the hood, it’s not for the reasons that we would want to see, but nonetheless, some of it is due to these long-term sustained investments in energy efficiency and they keep happening there they’ve continued and they are delivering however, energy efficiency industries and some of the project work has definitely been stalled much more than other areas in the clean energy marketplace. Lisa: Residential energy efficiency in particular is still not nearly back up to the pace that it was in a normal year. And, I think some of the latest estimates show at least about 400,000 clean energy jobs that have not been restored since the pandemic and many of them are in the energy efficiency, residential space. So we have- Jon: Could you talk about that for a second. I actually gave a presentation last week to an HR conference that we’re looking at sort of the next industries. And I specifically use the information from the data, the Factsbook, and there’s an amazing slide there that shows energy efficiency, jobs in pink versus… it’s like a hockey stick of energy efficiency jobs, and then all the other jobs below it is solar, coal and it’s really easy for people to think about a solar job or a wind job. But when you raise energy efficiency, if you don’t know the industry equivalent what is that? So how would you define just for folks that aren’t familiar with an energy efficiency job? Lisa: Right. Well, I mean, just to be clear, the data we’re using in the Factbook is the data from the US energy employment report that comes out each year and the lead researcher for that is a BW research. And so they have some pretty specific definitions, but generally speaking these are anything from contractors to energy efficiency financers, people that work in ESCOs, people that work in utility efficiency programs, efficiency equipment manufacturers. So like the whole supply chain of energy efficiency, and they have to work at least 50%. Many of them are full-time, but there are some challenges with methodologies as it relates to energy efficiency, workers in the contracting field, but there are established methodologies, and I think the important thing is the same methodologies are used every year. So it is a benchmark that’s worth looking at, even though it may be imperfect, but energy efficiency jobs are everywhere, right. There’re some people say there’s certain power… Well, anyway, I’m going to want to go off in too much of the weeds here, but energy efficiency jobs are everywhere and they are sustained day in and day out employment opportunities. Lisa: So this is an area that’s already was the largest segment really of the US energy workforce. And it was over 2.3 million jobs at the beginning of 2020. And there have been some losses and furloughs, but this is an area for continued growth, for sure. Jon: Absolutely. Ethan there’s been obviously some significant shifts and changes to the market in 2020. Some of the trends we were seeing for instance on corporate PPA is slowed down just because people weren’t signing PPAs last year as much, but we did see major commitments on climate and other renewable goals by companies. And we also saw just a dramatic shift in the global supply chains, as you know, so much was affected by COVID, of those trends, all those shifts we saw in 2020, what do you sort of see correcting itself in 2021? And what do you see that some of those will just be a continued shift? Ethan: Good question. I mean, I would say, yeah, it wasn’t a spectacular year in the grand scheme of things for corporate power purchase agreements, but it was a very good year in terms of corporate commitments on procuring more renewable energy and science-based targets to reduce CO2 emissions from companies. So that, to my mind, foreshadows a rebound in corporate PPA activity going forward, because if you want to actually hit these targets, you’re going to actually have to procure that clean energy. So I think that was probably a bit of a short-term thing. Ethan: We also had a bit of a boom, I would say 2019 was probably particularly good years for corporate PPAs as well in part, because there was a huge pipeline of projects coming online in 2020. And as Lisa mentioned, I mean, it was a record where 34 gigawatts of wind and solar built last year, and first let’s note that that’s remarkable. Jon: Remarkable. Ethan: Given that it was a super weird year, and that there were some real challenges to people actually getting their jobs done. As you know, during parts of the year, particularly on the residential and commercial photovoltaic side, it was not easy to get into people’s homes or onto people’s roofs, or do any of that kind of work or to market your services door to door, which is what a bunch of these companies Jon: Can we get permits done on town councils that weren’t meeting… Ethan: Exactly. Jon: so many weird, weird hiccups though. Ethan: That build was remarkable. It was like basically 50% higher than the second best year we’ve ever recorded. It was in part the factor, partly that drove that was it there a lot of money that was invested in 2019, and it takes time for that to then manifest itself and projects completed. And that was a record we saw for investments in 2019. The other thing was concerned around tax credits expiring at the end of 2020. And that really front-loaded some stuff into the calendar year that maybe would have gone a little further, although it’s hard to see how it would not have been at record, because it was such an enormous amount of stuff that got built over all. So obviously whatever impact those projects come online, that’s going to be long-lasting and they’re going to operate for the next 20, 30 years, whatever that is. But I think Jon: On the tax credit piece for a second, the extension obviously is fantastic. The industry looking at other work that you guys have done just sitting in the finance side, the tax credit space is exciting from a return perspective. It’s super challenging from a supply perspective. There’s just not that much a bunch out there. I mean, do you guys still consider that to be… Or what is your view on what choke hold that will play in continued growth here? Ethan: Well, that’s a really good question. And that was actually one of the other sort of question marks slash challenges of 2020, was it about April, May started to hear sort of rumblings about people saying things like, well some projects will get financed, but more adventurous projects may not have sort of code name, I think for. Yeah great example. Jon: So many things, Ethan: Yeah, anything that wasn’t like a standard Vestus wind turbine or your project, I think even PV plus storage was considered slightly weird. And so that wasn’t great, obviously. But look, the click that the proofs is somewhat in the pudding clearly is enough tax equity to get 34 gigawatts of wind and solar bill. Right. So if it’s been done once, presumably it can be done again. I think people are more confident about earnings from the banks and others now than they certainly were in April and May of 2020. So, I mean, I generally feel pretty good, but the point still remains on tax equity, which is that it’s just a fundamentally stupid way to try and subsidize the industry. It’s just the one that we happen to use in this country because it’s politically acceptable. Jon: Yeah, Lisa when we look back at the beginning of the last week, we went back to the last Factbook, you go back to sort of the Obama administration coming in and our money coming forward with the idea of shovel-ready projects. This industry was so nascent at the time. Even I remember our first interview, you talked about the shift in the industry from folks in jeans and ponytails to suits at conferences, right? It was just a shift that really happened over the last decade. Ethan: We’re onto man bonds now just. Jon: Yeah that’s right. Ethan: I don’t know I can’t Jon: But the reality is there was a major pour, a major outpour of public sector dollars that came in and has really helped accelerate bringing down the cost of technologies, bring efficiency to the workforce and really scale. But now looking at the last two years, even with the COVID, but the fundamentals of the industry are really strong. Jon: The private dollars are coming in like never before, but now we’re beginning of another new administration Lisa being in DC, that’s super supportive of what we want to get done here to solve the climate crisis. What should folks begin to expect? I’m going to get to the sort of stimulus side of this in a moment, but just in terms of other policy changes over the next year to 18 months, that will help continue to sort of push the trends we’re seeing in the Factbook forward. We’d just love your thoughts on sort of where the new administration is going to play there. Lisa: Well, I think, yeah, the new administration has been very clear about its concerns about climate change and the need to reduce our emissions globally, to meet the tests that the scientific community has set. We need to dramatically reduce our emissions. We also are seeing, and we’re recording this just a week after the blackouts and the grid challenges in Texas, Oklahoma, and a number of other states, but 2020 was a year and you’ll see this in the Factbook. We had very expensive and broadly felt natural disasters throughout the country, wildfires, droughts, floods. It was very expensive for our economy, but most importantly, really harmful to communities. So this new administration has also put a marker out there on resilience and resilient infrastructure. But I think when I look at taking a step back what’s going to influence deployment and investment. Lisa: I look kind of at the highest level. And then I also looked down at the more operational policy level at the highest level, we rejoined Paris. We are sending a signal to the market for this administration, that global engagement on climate change is critical, essential, and we want to be in, and by doing that, we’re going to set high level directional policies, that signal markets to low and zero carbon investment. And we want the US business community to lead in that. And we want to provide our technologies and services here at home, but also globally. So that’s kind of at the highest level, like this is a directional shift, and we’re doing it in a way that the Obama administration wasn’t able to do with that time. It was much more incremental conversation then, doesn’t mean that this will be easy, but that’s where they are. Lisa: And then there’s a whole suite of policies that are being looked at that both trying to improve our economic condition post COVID, but also simultaneously ensure that when the federal government spends money, it’s doing it consistent with the climate and resilience goals while creating jobs and meeting other tests that they set for themselves. So it’s a very ambitious agenda, but it also is trying to take a holistic approach. So at the highest levels of what the US government is projecting here at home and to the world and what they’re trying to implement on the ground. Jon: I feel like they have to… the last round, it was a need for the federal grant to really lead the way and drive and create space. And now the markets are so aligned to support what we want to get done. Some of it is just really enabling that and putting in place the incremental changes and some monumental changes, but to keep the private capital really going forward. Because I think either in the capital side, there’s nothing better for, for the capital than certainty and policy certainty and establishing some of that. And that leadership again, is going to be really critical to open the doors. And part of that is we are going to see a massive, hopefully we’re going to see a significant stimulus or folks are calling the green stimulus. We’d love your thoughts on how that will affect what we care about in the clean energy industry. Ethan: It’s a good question. Maybe first, just more broadly on the policy question, it does here in the power sector, which is mostly what we’re going to talk about. We’re talking about so far decarbonisation has a certain momentum to it right now. And the reason why coal the achieved 19% of generation last year down from 45 a decade ago is, it’s just not cost competitive. It’s just bucket by gas, which is cheap and renewables, which is a zero marginal cost. Ethan: That trend we think can basically continues over the next five years. It doesn’t list to be clear. It doesn’t get you to a zero emission picture, but it does create a lot of momentum. Ethan: It’s the other sectors of the economy that just, aren’t going to click aren’t going to decarbonize themselves and particularly rotation. And that’s where just such a massive difference between the Trump administration and potentially the Biden administration, the regulations around corporate average fuel economy standards. This is just a hugely important. Jon: having a Superbowl commercial electric vehicles. Ethan: Absolutely. I mean you see corporate bonding, right? Automakers that were dragging their feet and, fighting California tooth and nail are now suddenly promising to abolish internal come on jet engines and yeah, running great ads about how, not always our enemy because 30% of their sales or EVs or whatever it is. Ethan: So there’s, there’s a lot the administration really can get across in other areas. Last thing I’ll just say on Paris and I agree with Lisa that I think it sends a good signal. I’ll go one step further, which is, I also think that getting back into Paris actually puts important pressure back on the Biden administration itself to do something material between now and when the next cop takes place. Ethan: Because I think unfortunately the global lesson that a lot of people have taken away from the last four years is that unless the US legislates a real commitment to reduce its emissions, then you really have to be concerned that they won’t continue to follow through on their commitments because basically the Trump administration just sought to water down and walk away from everything that had been pursued in the prior eight years. So I don’t think it’s unfair of the rest of the world to expect us to pass legislation that enshrines these goals in some fundamental way. And that in turn means that the by administration has to put this at the top of their list this year. They can’t get back burnered into it . Jon: And so can you paint a picture Lisa like when people talk about a green stimulus, what are we expecting coming out of Washington? and what type of timeline are we expecting it? Lisa: Well, there’s a lot of talk about once this first COVID relief package gets passed, which we’re now being interviewed, where we were at the end of February. So maybe by late March, early April that will pass. And that could certainly slip, but I think there is an interest in trying to get it done before the end of March, because of some of the critical support programs to families and others that will expire. Lisa: So then the tables will turn to what comes next. And I think there’s a lot of conversation about a large infrastructure package, which would include a lot of investment and perhaps research development, deployment dollars that would support clean energy technologies. And we look at what they did and what Congress has passed, really over the last six to eight years, it has been a mix of investment in research development and deployment and tax policy. Lisa: So I think when a relatively conservative view of what congress might accomplish this session, or by the end of the Congress in a couple of years, there’s an expectation that that is kind of the center of the bullseye. You have some kind of a tax set of set of tax initiatives and clean energy would be part of it. And then it researched development deployment set of investments. What comes beyond that? Things like the clean energy standard, or some kind of carbon pricing or other legislative activity, we really just don’t know. And obviously there’s a lot of speculation procedurally, how you would do that. And we have very tight margins in both the house and the Senate, so we could have a whole podcast on that, but I think there will be action. It will include clean energy. And we have an administration that supports that. So what we didn’t have congress passed these before was kind of a forward-leaning supporter in the administration. Now we do. And so that’s kind of a base of operation. And then let’s see what we can do beyond that. Ethan: Which is just tax cuts. I certainly complained about them earlier, but they in terms of being an efficient use of subsidizing an industry, they are politically acceptable. It would appear to Joe Manchin, who is the… And as a result, it does look like that leads the conversations, at least we’re hearing here in Washington, is it, that’s the type of support that we’re going to see potentially going forward. Jon: Do you see that thing both for energy storage and then possibly the cash grant they’ve been hearing a lot about, Ethan: I haven’t heard as much about the cash grant so much as just the energy storage and for renewables, and maybe even some thought about how to subsidize anything that’s zero carbon. I mean, it is worth noting that we have an interesting state where, a fifth of our power from coal, a fifth of our power is from renewables. And a fifth of our power is from nuclear. And those plants, if you want to get to zero carbon, you got to keep those online and they’re not doing so great financially. So that very well may be part of some tax credit discussion as well. Jon: Lisa, what message you want to give to the audience of something they can do to help push some of these things forward in Washington. What would you tell them to do, other than reading the Factbook? Of course, that’s step one. Lisa: Well, I mean, engage locally with your members of Congress, and if you have a clean energy story to tell don’t take that for granted. I mean, I just mentioned, we have a sister organization under the BCSC called clean energy business network, and they represent small and medium sized businesses in clean energy sectors all over the country. One of the things they do when we released the Factbook is that they do a complimentary campaign called Faces Behind the Facts where they profile business leaders and to do just that, to tell their story. And I still think that these constituent relationships matter, especially in places where climate change may not necessarily be the number one talking point that politicians, speak about when they do town halls or other things. So I really think getting the local message out that clean energies, reliable, affordable, practical, and it is happening in our area wherever I live and sharing that is really important. Jon: Yeah. I think some of the strongest advocacy, both in Washington and locally, as we can tell your own story, but back it up with these facts, right? So I think people get nervous about the story they can tell it’s for the audience, the personal story is a powerful, but the work is done for you. Both Ethan and Lisa and her team have done the work to help you put the facts together to help push the policies we need forward. So get on it. And then Ethan, we come back to do this next year. What should we expect in terms of the trends? Ethan: Gosh, a good question. I mean, I think one of the points we did try and make in the Factbook this year was look, 2020 was super weird we all know that. And so for instance, US CO2 emissions felt 9% year to year. And from 2019 and 2020, it’s an incredible drop. Let’s put it this way, if emissions don’t take back up, then we’ve got some other big problems, which is that our economy is still really going to be we’ll have really been stalled out. So it’s almost in my mind that now there are a lot of things that go into emissions and weather, whatever, but if emissions don’t take back up again then we’ve got a really deep recession. I think they will take back up because the economy does seem to be recovering. Ethan: So overall in the macro sense, energy usage almost certainly will go up again. Let’s actually hope it does go up. But the larger trends that we’ve seen, which is improving energy efficiency decarbonization of the power sector, that stuff will continue. I have less confidence about becoming more efficient and fuel efficient and less submitting in the transportation sector, just because I think they’re not under the same kind of pressures economically, or even from regulation, but hopefully that will change by the end of the year as well. Jon: Yeah. Interesting. I remember pictures going around in April and may have some of the capitals around the world and how clear they were from smog. Right. And just a realization like that’s unfortunate. It’s not going to stay the same Lisa: And no cars on the road. Remember the rush hour shots of LA, DC, Chicago. There was nobody on the road and other capitals around the world. We were not obviously the United States. We weren’t the only ones. So the traffic coming back, unfortunately. Jon: Yeah. Well thank you both for the time and challenge everyone to go get the Factbook, give it a read, use it as much as you can in an advocacy. And if you’re writing our it’s just a great thing to link to. And thank you both for the incredible story that you’re helping to tell for our industry. Lisa: Thank you so much. Ethan: Thanks for this opportunity. Lisa: And stay well, stay healthy stay safe. Jon: You too. And thanks to the teams at the business council for sustainable energy and BloombergNEF producers, Colleen Young and Carly Battin for helping to put this together, you’ll always get more episodes @cleancapital.com and look forward to continue the conversation [/av_textblock] [av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”] [av_social_share title=’Share this entry’ style=” buttons=” share_facebook=” share_twitter=” share_pinterest=” share_gplus=” share_reddit=” share_linkedin=” share_tumblr=” share_vk=” share_mail=” av-desktop-hide=” av-medium-hide=” av-small-hide=” av-mini-hide=” av_uid=’av-354olk’] [av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”] [av_button label=’More Podcasts’ link=’page,5266′ link_target=” size=’small’ position=’center’ label_display=” icon_select=’no’ icon=’ue800′ font=’entypo-fontello’ color=’theme-color’ custom_bg=’#444444′ custom_font=’#ffffff’ av_uid=’av-jx1x7jx3′ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”] [av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]
Experts Only Podcast #85: Understanding the Texas Grid with Jonathon Monken [av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/podcast-image-pageheader2.jpg’ attachment=’4329′ attachment_size=’full’ copyright=” caption=” styling=” align=’center’ font_size=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ animation=’no-animation’ hover=” appearance=” link=” target=” title_attr=” alt_attr=” id=” custom_class=” av_element_hidden_in_editor=’0′ av_uid=’av-jwwgyb48′ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image] [av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’20’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”] [av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgxszg’ admin_preview_bg=”] Episode 85: Understanding the Texas Grid with Jonathon Monken [/av_textblock] [av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’10’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”] [av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwl4lsb2′ admin_preview_bg=”] We’re back with a timely Experts Only podcast episode. Host Jon Powers recently interviewed Jonathon Monken, Principal of Converge Strategies, about the devastation taking place in Texas. Hear from an industry expert on how a polar vortex could cause this chain of disasters impacting power, water, and other major infrastructure. Learn about the failures that took place within the grid, and most importantly, how experts are planning for this to never happen again. [/av_textblock] [av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’20’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”] [av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwh5253′ admin_preview_bg=”] Listen now: [/av_textblock] [av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’20’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-k4so2umi’ admin_preview_bg=”] [av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ExpertsOnly-bar-Monken-1-1030×258.jpg’ attachment=’8018′ attachment_size=’large’ copyright=” caption=” styling=” align=’center’ font_size=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ animation=’no-animation’ hover=” appearance=” link=’manually,https://soundcloud.com/experts-only/episode-85-understanding-the-texas-grid-with-jonathon-monken’ target=’_blank’ title_attr=” alt_attr=” lazy_loading=’disabled’ id=” custom_class=” av_element_hidden_in_editor=’0′ av_uid=’av-k37p0z0j’ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image] [av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=” admin_preview_bg=”] [av_textblock textblock_styling_align=” textblock_styling=” textblock_styling_gap=” textblock_styling_mobile=” size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” template_class=” av_uid=’av-l6cc9wk9′ sc_version=’1.0′ admin_preview_bg=”] Transcript: [/av_textblock] [av_textblock textblock_styling_align=” textblock_styling=” textblock_styling_gap=” textblock_styling_mobile=” size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” template_class=” av_uid=’av-l6ccb8aw’ sc_version=’1.0′ admin_preview_bg=”] Jon Powers: Welcome to Experts Only podcast sponsored by Clean Capital. Learn more at cleancapital.com. I’m your host, Jon Powers. Each week we explore the intersection of energy, innovation, and finance with leaders across the industry. Thank you so much for joining us. Jon Powers: Welcome back. I’m your host, Jon Powers, and we have a very special episode today. We usually don’t jump on current event opportunities, but this we could not miss. Clearly folks are following the disaster that’s happened in Texas because of the polar vortex and the power outage, as well as loss of water and another major infrastructure. We wanted to bring in Jonathan Mon ken, who is with Converge Strategies, but is really, previously the senior director for systems resilience and strategic coordination of PJM. Jon is a West Point grad and a energy security and national security expert. Jon really understands what’s going on today within the grid, and some of the failures happened around resilience. Jon Powers: So we’re going to really quickly jump on this topic and talk through some of the failures we saw in Texas, and how to really plan to ensure this doesn’t happen again. I hope you enjoy this conversation. And, as always, you can get more episodes at cleancapital.com. Jon, thanks so much for joining me. Jonathon Monken: Absolutely, Jon, thanks for having me. Jon Powers: This is a special episode. We usually don’t dive into as much current events as we are today, but so much on the news recently about what’s happening in Texas, and the polar vortex that has really just shut the state down economically with power, with water, it’s just an absolute mess. And I really want to take this chance to talk to you as an expert in the space and help explain to people what is actually going on. And before we do that, I do want to step back and just set the table a little bit for folks who may not know you and, I think, your experience in this space. You, first of all came out of the military, you’re a West Pointer, correct? Jonathon Monken: That’s right, yeah. Jon Powers: All right. And then you ended up going into a career in national security and then sort of an energy security. Jonathon Monken: Right. Jon Powers: And most recently you were at PGM as a senior director for system resilience and strategic coordination before converge. So talk a little bit, just for a second, about your sort of career path here and why you’re sort of teed up to be able to talk about these issues. Jonathon Monken: Yeah, it’s interesting. I have a very winding path in terms of how this really brings me to the energy sector in general. And so, essentially, when I transitioned out of the military my focus was in state government. So I was the head of the Illinois State Police for a couple of years. I was the head of the Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety, Emergency Management and Homeland Security in Illinois for four years. Jonathon Monken: And in that capacity, I started doing disaster responses. And so certainly Illinois has its fair share, right? There’s plenty of everything from tornadoes to polar vortexes and floods. And so in that capacity, I started working a lot with utilities in the state of trying to understand what I could do to support them and vice versa. Recognizing the fact that if there’s, the single most important question that people are asking immediately following a disaster is how many people don’t have power, because it’s such an important indicator as to every other area of the response and how it’s going. Jonathon Monken: And so I really just doubled down on that engagement with utilities and started working specifically in the energy sector because of this recognition that this is the linchpin that everything else just kind of hovers around. And so when I got to PJM, which is the largest wholesale energy market in the world, it’s the largest grid operator in north America, they had a vested interest in saying that we need to have a formal resilience program because we can’t just let this thing happen by accident. Jonathon Monken: And it requires this cross-functional approach of saying, well, there’s a market component to it, there’s a transmission planning component to it, a realtime operations, physical and cyber security. All of these things are part of this resilience puzzle. And so that’s really where I engaged and spent my time is coordinating with federal entities from the Department of Defense to the Department of Energy and FEMA on how these things are done. How you develop power outage incident annexes or engage utilities in this way. How you develop and execute exercises in this space. Jonathon Monken: So it’s really become this, this whole thing of energy resilience that takes each piece of what I’ve done previously in my life, whether it’s military, law enforcement, homeland security, emergency management, and just kind of bundles it into one. And I think Texas is seeing impacts associated with literally every one of those areas. And so it’s just unique. Jon Powers: Yeah. So I want to come back to Texas in one second, and I want to come back to this conversation later in another podcast. I would love to hear about how your experience working across the bureaucracy has helped you work across the utility too. Jonathon Monken: Yeah. Jon Powers: And bring those together. But before diving into Texas, just for folks that aren’t familiar with Converged Strategies as well, and your just incredible team you guys have there, can you just talk for a second about what you guys do at Converge? Jonathon Monken: Yeah, small but mighty. So essentially- Jon Powers: All rock stars really. Jonathon Monken: That’s right. Exactly. That’s exactly right. So really our focus is on the intersection of advanced energy technology and national security. And the touch points there are practically infinite when you recognize the fact that it’s so consequential to the execution of these national security functions and homeland security functions is the availability of electricity. Of making sure these infrastructure systems are there to support it, because otherwise it exponentially increases both the demand on finite resources during these events and how they’re ultimately planned for, to try and mitigate against these consequences. Jonathon Monken: And so that’s what we really do is perform, function in this cross-functional space. But bringing together those huge bureaucracies, both within the industry and government, and saying, hey, there’s, there’s some shaded area in the Venn diagram here that we need to work on if we both want to succeed adverse operating conditions. Jon Powers: And speaking of adverse operating conditions, we’re seeing, just to set the stage. I think everyone has seen the news, people with water frozen in their bathtub in Texas right now, and had been without electricity. This will probably premiere a week after most of this has been, at least on the power side, fixed. But Texas in its own right, I just want to set the stage of why Texas is unique as an energy beast, because it has its own grid, it’s not interconnected between states. Can you talk a little bit about what that structure looks like for folks? Jonathon Monken: Yeah, absolutely. So Texas essentially functions as an island. So across the United States, what you have is a network of independent system operators or regional transmission organizations and these balancing authorities that essentially do this realtime grid management across large swaths of the country. And so when you take the United States as a whole, there’s three interconnections, Eastern interconnection, Western interconnection, and the Texas interconnection. So, it’s the only one that’s not really regionally aligned in a multi-state environment. And there’s a lot of reasons for that, not the least of which is it basically allows them to be exempt from federal regulation on interstate transmission. So they’ve actively chosen to function as an island. Jonathon Monken: Where anywhere else in the country if you have a frequency deviation or a blip on the radar from the grid perspective in Florida, you’re going to feel it in New York, because they’re part of the same interconnection. They’re going to see the grid physics impacts across the entirety of the region, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing at all. In the vast majority of instances that’s a great thing, because you really know what’s happening around with your neighbors, and you have a friend you can call on when you need to move that sofa to the third floor walkup. You’ve got somebody that you can trust to help you. Jon Powers: So just for the one on one basis of this for a second. So because Texas is an island in itself, meaning it literally can’t pull power from Oklahoma and Louisiana or whoever it’s neighbors are. Jonathon Monken: That’s exactly right. Jon Powers: So when they were talking on Fox News about frozen wind turbines, which we’ll come back to, where they’re having issues with, there literally is nowhere else for them to pull power in, because they’re unplugged. Jonathon Monken: That’s right. And a fundamental truth of how grids are restored in general is you work from the outside in. So, basically, you go to areas that have stable power and you push the dominoes back up from the outside in. That’s the fundamental blocking and tackling of grid restoration. And when you have a system that’s isolated like that, if it hits the edges of your system, that’s it, there’s nowhere else to go. There is no one to call upon to have that stable grid and that stable flow of electricity that you can build your own system back off of. Jonathon Monken: And that’s what’s so unique about this circumstance is that when you’re on an island, there’s nowhere else to go. Jon Powers: So I’m going to come back to what caused this, from a maybe regulatory perspective and policy perspective, but just paint a picture for the audience of… I think people who read the media reports or, especially the energy Twitter-verse, Tucker Carlson’s comments have gone all over the place. But, really, on the ground, what happened over the last week in Texas? And it has caused people to go sometimes hours, sometimes days, without power. Jonathon Monken: Yeah, at it’s most fundamental level what they experienced was a significant winter peak in demand for electricity. Essentially, something that does not happen with regularity, something that they’re going to see multiple times in an individual year. And the combined effect of having this significant increase in load, which was really a byproduct of the fact that 75% of the heating for customers in Texas uses electricity, not gas, which you would normally see in places like New England or your beloved Buffalo. You’re going to have a lot of gas there, right? Jonathon Monken: Instead, what you’ve got is this huge demand on the grid. And what they had was a system that was not ready for it, because they had so many generators, so much capacity on the system, they had to come offline because of the operating conditions they were experiencing. And, essentially, you can just see, there’s no more juice to give. You’ve got all this demand on the system. There’s nothing available to deliver to it. And they were really only able to get electricity to roughly half of all the customers in Texas, which is an unprecedented event. I mean, you, there is not an equivalent in UA history to reference. Jon Powers: Yeah. I was reading recently about what’s going on in Austin and San Antonio is it CPS, right, correct, is that the. Jonathon Monken: Yes, yeah. Jon Powers: And they had shut down, I think three out of every five customers there. And the only reason the other two didn’t get shut down is because they happened to be living up maybe next to a fire station, which is critical infrastructure, right? Jonathon Monken: Yeah. That’s exactly right. And in this instance Texas performed load shedding, which is basically taking customers off the system. And every grid operator has a load shedding process, a list of procedures and things that they’re going to do in order to reduce that pressure, that demand on the system. And typically what you have is a system that’s prioritized, and it’s basically at the feeder level. So like you said, if you happen to live on a street with a police station or a fire station, odds are the utility is identified that distribution feeder saying this one’s a priority, that would be the last thing or one of the last things that we take off the system. Jonathon Monken: But essentially it has to come from somewhere. And so one of the biggest challenges is usually the utility gets to be the chooser of how this is going to happen and where it’s going to come off the system, but that’s because the number is typically very finite. You’re not talking about lots and lots and lots of customers. This is a very unique circumstance where you’re saying you have to lose half of the system. You’re well beyond the planning criteria that’s established for utilities of saying, oh, these feeders are going to come off first. You’re way past that. Now you’re in uncharted territory of saying, we’re just going to have to take as much off the system as fast as we can to get some level of balance back in the system. Jon Powers: So, a lot people argue this is, or argue, I think appropriately, a lot of this is driven by climate change. We’re going to see more of these situations driven by climate change. How does this compare to say like a superstorm Sandy that happened, almost a decade ago, I guess now, and had similar, complete shutout, blackouts across places like New York and New Jersey and Connecticut? Jonathon Monken: Well, I think the most fascinating difference between, if we look at a hurricane driven event, is that there was no substantial infrastructure damage that was associated with this outage. When you talk about Puerto Rico, you talk about Sandy, you talk about Katrina, these are horrible events, right, millions of people without power. But there was massive physical damage to infrastructure that really was the catalyst for the outage. And then to take time to stand those poles back up and rerun that wire and bring all these… This was a fascinating event because it was an event without damage, right? Jonathon Monken: You weren’t knocking down transmission lines. You didn’t have 120 mile an hour winds and massive storm surge and all these other things causing it. This was a misoperation of the system. This is fundamentally a byproduct of a poorly constructed energy market and the operational procedures that support it. Jon Powers: Let’s go back to that piece in one second. And last sort of question for you is, as you looked at the baseload across the utility. There’s been a lot made in the conservative space around the fault of renewables here, when the reality is gas had equal, if not more of a role to play. Can you just for a second, talk about that baseload, what it’s comprised of, and then what were some of the root causes to… You mentioned, I live near Buffalo, New York. We have turbines literally sitting the edge of the Great Lakes, which freeze every year. But those things run fine, right? Jonathon Monken: Yeah, that’s right. Yeah, that’s exactly right. Jon Powers: The turbines themselves, they work. Jonathon Monken: Yeah. Jon Powers: What was the cause of that reduction in production? Jonathon Monken: So essentially what you have, and baseload is the right term to use, because essentially that’s the vernacular that has been brought forth in this discussion about legacy generation versus next generation. So when we’re talking about advanced technologies, we’re talking about renewables and those types of things that are coming onto the system. Those are considered this intermittent load, or intermittent capacity, these resources that are kind of on and off the system, depending on the conditions and what the circumstances are. Baseload is a generic reference to say your fossil burning capabilities, right? Your coal, your natural gas. And then you get into things like nuclear. Jonathon Monken: And so those are things that comprise this, these kind of, the concept is this always on covering your bare minimum across the board for what you ultimately need to do. And that it’s also touted as the resilient component of the grid itself. Of saying, well, it’s more capable of being on whenever you call on it. And it’s something that’s dependable and is always going to be there. Jonathon Monken: And I think the circumstance that you see here is, to your point earlier, this was not an issue of well, the wind capacity dropped, and that’s what, what covered it. I mean, even if, let’s say all the wind was completely on, as a percentage of its total installed capacity you’re only talking about 10% and they lost 50%. They lost 50% of their ability to deliver. And so the number of base load generators that were incapable of delivering as a percentage of their own installed base, as a percentage of what they contribute on a regular basis, their drop off was substantially high by orders of magnitude. So they failed at a much higher rate. Jonathon Monken: In fact, wind in terms of its average, was down in only in a single digit percentage of its regular output, expected output, at that time of year. So not the cause of it, right, it’s not going to be the thing that knocks four and a half million people off the system. Jon Powers: Right. Jonathon Monken: It’s just one piece of the puzzle. Jon Powers: So let’s go to that puzzle and putting that puzzle together. And I think, you’ve mentioned this earlier, but really sort of the failure here in both market design and sort of resource management. Talk a little bit about, what are the failures you’re seeing there? And then, how does Texas move forward? What lessons did we learn that can be shared in other markets here? Jonathon Monken: Yeah. So, essentially, I think what we’ve seen is that, your point earlier about how much of an anomaly was this weather event, and, certainly, there are ties to climate change here, right? Jon Powers: Right. Jonathon Monken: It’s not as anomalous as you’d be led to believe. Meaning that Texas has had multiple cold snaps in recent past that have caused outages, just on a different scale. And so the frustrating circumstance of it all is that there are steps that can be taken and have been taken in other areas of the United States to be able to account for those types of winter peaks and that type of operating condition. As you indicated, upstate New York has wind turbines and they make it through the winter. Jonathon Monken: And so, essentially what you have is, this is a byproduct of a market that’s built around least cost of delivery. At the expense of essentially everything else we’re going to go for the cheapest megawatt hour we can possibly find under any conditions, and that’s what’s going to build up the base of our grid. Jonathon Monken: And so the byproduct of that is, for people who are building these generation assets, when you’re saying least cost of delivery is what allows me to get into the market and make money here and get customers, you are going to forego anything that’s an additional expense that you deem to be non-essential. Jonathon Monken: And one of those examples is winterizing your assets in Texas. Because you look at it and say, statistically speaking, I don’t think it’s going to happen. So I’m not going to pony up the extra money and winterize these resources because that’s going to cost money. If you’re a natural gas generating facility in Northern states, a lot of natural gas plants purchase firm service for natural gas delivery, making them a priority instead of the last person to get natural gas when conditions are tight. Jonathon Monken: You’re going to pay for it, right? You’re going to winterize your low voltage electronics and the control systems in the generating facilities themselves so that they don’t freeze up in this circumstance. You’re going to potentially procure a dual fuel contract of saying like, I actually can run on gas, or I can run on oil, or I can run on diesel, or I have a battery backup on site. I have another resource that I can leverage. Those are all expenses that are not incentivized in the Texas market right now. And so they just don’t build it because they think the probability is low enough that it’s not going to be an issue. Jon Powers: What type of, the economic hit, I think, is still very much to be discovered here. I think the economic hit, obviously, of Sandy was hundreds of billions of dollars, and think about Texas and Houston and Austin, and some of these hubs shutting down for days will be equivalent in terms of dollars. How much is it going to cost to now retrofit? Jonathon Monken: Oh. Jon Powers: That realization, right. And, and how does Texas get its head around third party owners of, I use the wind turbines as an example, but maybe use a natural gas plan as well. Are they going to put out grants to do this? How do they start to wrestle with this going forward? Jonathon Monken: Yeah, it’s a great question because, essentially, the last statistic that I saw is that ERCOT had actually done an analysis of what the economic impact of the loss per megawatt hour would be for whenever they had failures. And this was following the 2011 cold weather event, where they had to shed about 4,000 megawatts. And so, essentially, based on the- Jon Powers: What was the total megawatt shed this time, do we know? Jonathon Monken: This time we’re talking about, essentially we’re looking at more than 15,000 megawatts, more than 20,000 megawatts. We’re talking four to five times bigger than what we had before. And so, using their own math, essentially what they’ve determined is that every 24 hour period for the size of load loss in this particular event, it’s two and a half billion dollars in economic impact, economic opportunity that was lost as a result of the outage. And we’re already four days passed, right? Jonathon Monken: And so you’re talking about 10 billion dollars of lost economic opportunity. So when you’re talking about the price tag, what an interesting question. Because at this point it’s worth $10 billion or more to make this investment. And essentially, it does not turn on a dime. Jon Powers: Not at all. Jonathon Monken: All of these strategies that were developed in Northern states to build out things like capacity, performance markets and these winterization techniques and the things that you can do, it’s a years long process of implementing. But, essentially, what normally would cost 5% over the construction cost of these resources, now you’re talking 10 to 15% to go back and retrofit all of these systems to be able to withstand these types of events. Jonathon Monken: And so you can socialize that cost. You can spread it out amongst rate payers and say, okay, well, these things are eligible for rate based recovery. So it’s either going to be taxpayer dollars or rate payer dollars, right, for the state of Texas. But one way or another, they’re going to have to spend some money. Jon Powers: Is there any chance this shakes up the whole ERCOT structure and Texas is no longer an island or? Jonathon Monken: Well, maybe. I mean, there was a NERC, a North American Electric Reliability Corporation, and FERC, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, both of them published reports following each of the last two cold weather events that forced customers off the system in Texas, neither of which were heeded. So at this point, in the absence of enforcing federal regulation on them, there’s really, it’s up to Texas to try and figure out what they’re going to do. Jonathon Monken: And I think you raise a really interesting question, which is, if they can’t implement on their own and they’ve had multiple opportunities to do it, and have passed previous legislation within the state of Texas to try and force this winterization that just wasn’t heeded and never enforced. At some point, it’s going to have to come home and roost, because you, they can’t continue on this way, assuming that it’s just never going to happen again, because twice in a decade is not an irregular event. It is now well inside of the planning cycle of a grid operator. Jon Powers: Interesting. And then finally, I think, obviously, all of these outages, it’ll take months to sort of wrap head around all the lessons that are going to be applied here. But in the utility-verse of folks that are, that you engage with, what are you sort of just forecasting? What are some of the major lessons that you think others will pick up on here and try to implement in their own? Jon Powers: I mean, there’s so much happening, first of all, just in the utility space in general, the markets are getting shifted. And many places are just completely flipping over because of the insurgents of renewables and storage. And you have a new administration that’s going to push new policies. But this is equivalent to a superstorm Sandy level event, where it can be game changing, not just for utilities, but for the customers, the Walmarts, the eBays, the Apples, others who have operations in Dallas and Texas. What kind of lessons do you see coming out of this that can help ensure that we don’t have a situation like this again? Jonathon Monken: Well, I mean, I think a big part of it is that there has long been the drum beat of the least cost delivery of service. And I think there are other areas of the country that have been able to identify value streams that resonate with customers. Jonathon Monken: And so one example is, people are willing to pay more, on average, to have carbon reduced or clean energy, right? People will willingly say yes, I will pay a little bit extra to make sure that I’m getting renewable. At this stage, I think you’d be hard pressed to find someone in Texas who wouldn’t pay extra money to have a more resilient grid. That says, you know what, the least cost thing had its benefits, but I’m willing to pay 15 cents a month more for my electricity, or $5 a month more for my electricity, to make sure that this doesn’t happen again, to make sure that the adequate steps are taken in order to harden the system, or harden generation to do it. Jon Powers: Let me ask you, just a follow-up on it. So think about Fort Hood, right? Fort Hood had a major sort of micro-grid program being put in place the last couple years with APEX energy and others. Any idea how that operated in this situation? Jonathon Monken: So we’re actually trying to unpack exactly what the extent of impacts to DOD facilities were, because Texas is, it’s a military state, right? I mean, some of the biggest military installations on the planet are located in Texas. And so essentially, I mean, I think, at first blush, they were not immune to these types of impacts. There was the opportunity to still, for the operator to make some choices as to where they were going to take people off of the system, based on that prioritization. And so it certainly insulated installations to a degree. Jonathon Monken: But I think it’s also a reminder of why they were pursuing a micro-grid program to begin with, which is, right, mission assurance. The ability to execute national defense missions is completely dependent on the availability of private infrastructure to execute. And this is a very harsh reminder of exactly why that’s important. And the amazing thing is, you just can’t point to something that says, well, we saw this, it was not a 2017 hurricane season, and says, well, it was a cat five hurricane that annihilated the transmission and distribution system. Jonathon Monken: This is something that was largely an unforced error, right? Jon Powers: Right. Jonathon Monken: Yes, it was extremely cold. Yes, that cold weather was rare. However, you can’t point to physical carnage as what got us here. And I think that’s a wake up call for DOD as well, of just understanding- Jon Powers: It wasn’t that cold, it’s like August in Buffalo, or is it there? Jonathon Monken: Yeah, right. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, you would’ve been out there in your shorts for sure. Jon Powers: Yeah. So Jon, well, first of all, part two of this, and you just talked about it. Part two of this podcast is going to be with Jon’s partner, Michael Wu, exploring DOD and energy security. We talked doing it for a while, and you’re going to hear that soon. But I just wanted to thank you so much for joining us on short notice to talk about this. It’s such an important issue and folks just don’t, really are trying to wrap their heads around what’s going on down there, so I really appreciate it. Jonathon Monken: Yeah, absolutely. It’s my pleasure to do it. And I think you’re asking the right questions here that need to be pursued, because it’s going to be the difference between our system doing what we really need it to do societally, and just failing us at the time we need it the most. Jon Powers: And thank you so much to Converge Strategies and to Adair and the team, they’re helping put this together, and to our producers, Colleen Young and Carly Battin. Jon Powers: As always, you can get more episodes at cleancapital.com and I look forward to continuing the conversation. Thanks. Jon Powers: Thanks for listening in today’s conversation. Find more episodes on cleancapital.com, iTunes or wherever you get your podcast. If you like what you hear be sure to subscribe and leave us a five star review. We look forward to continuing our conversation on energy, innovation and finance with you. [/av_textblock] [av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”] [av_social_share title=’Share this entry’ style=” buttons=” share_facebook=” share_twitter=” share_pinterest=” share_gplus=” share_reddit=” share_linkedin=” share_tumblr=” share_vk=” share_mail=” av-desktop-hide=” av-medium-hide=” av-small-hide=” av-mini-hide=” av_uid=’av-354olk’] [av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”] [av_button label=’More Podcasts’ link=’page,5266′ link_target=” size=’small’ position=’center’ label_display=” icon_select=’no’ icon=’ue800′ font=’entypo-fontello’ color=’theme-color’ custom_bg=’#444444′ custom_font=’#ffffff’ av_uid=’av-jx1x7jx3′ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”] [av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]
Experts Only Podcast #84: The Big Picture of Sustainability in the Film Industry with Julie Christeas and Jonny Blitstein