Listen:

Share:

Related Posts

Experts Only Podcast #74 With Climate Impact Investing Expert Nicole Systrom

[av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/podcast-image-pageheader2.jpg’ attachment=’4329′ attachment_size=’full’ copyright=” caption=” styling=” align=’center’ font_size=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ animation=’no-animation’ hover=” appearance=” link=” target=” title_attr=” alt_attr=” id=” custom_class=” av_element_hidden_in_editor=’0′ av_uid=’av-jwwgyb48′ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’20’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” template_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgxszg’ sc_version=’1.0′ admin_preview_bg=”]

Experts Only Podcast #74

With Climate Impact Investing Expert Nicole Systrom

[ Founder, Sutro Energy Group ]

[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’10’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwl4lsb2′ admin_preview_bg=”]
Our guest this week is Nicole Systrom, founder of Sutro Energy Group. Sutro Energy Group partners with philanthropists, investors and entrepreneurs to accelerate high-impact climate and clean technology solutions. Nicole serves on the board of directors for Activate, a non-profit supporting entrepreneurial scientists and engineers tackling the world’s biggest challenges; Prime Coalition, a non-profit providing funding to companies combating climate change; and the Energy Foundation.

Together with host Jon Powers, Nicole discusses the urgency surrounding the climate crisis and the ‘scientific and investment revolution’ needed to tackle it.
[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’20’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwl4lsb2′ admin_preview_bg=”]

Nicole Systrom’s recent articles:

[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’10’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwl4lsb2′ admin_preview_bg=”]

[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwh5253′ admin_preview_bg=”]

Listen now:

[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’20’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-k4so2umi’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ExpertsOnly-bar-Systrom.jpg’ attachment=’7747′ attachment_size=’full’ copyright=” caption=” styling=” align=’center’ font_size=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ animation=’no-animation’ hover=” appearance=” lazy_loading=’disabled’ link=’manually,https://link.chtbl.com/a7AU9kj7′ target=’_blank’ title_attr=” alt_attr=” id=” custom_class=” av_element_hidden_in_editor=’0′ av_uid=’av-k37p0z0j’ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” template_class=” av_uid=’av-ksgcvrs2′ sc_version=’1.0′ admin_preview_bg=”]
Transcript:
[/av_textblock]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” template_class=” av_uid=’av-ksgdbt8r’ sc_version=’1.0′ admin_preview_bg=”]
Jon Powers:

Welcome to Experts Only Podcast sponsored by CleanCapital. You can learn more at cleancapital.com. I’m your host Jon Powers. Each week, we explore the intersection of energy, innovation, and finance with leaders across the industry. Thank you so much for joining us.

Jon Powers:

Welcome Back to Experts Only Podcast. I’m your host Jon Powers. Today, we have a really fascinating conversation with the founder of Sutro Energy Group, Nicole Systrom. Nicole has spent much of her career facilitating innovations to help us address the existential threat of climate change. She works with fascinating organizations like Prime Coalition, Energy Foundation. She comes from a background of Stanford and has been working closely with the Stire and Taylor Center for Energy, Finance and Policy on focusing on investing in a new climate. The dialogue is about what the investment community needs to do to think longterm about solving the climate crisis, as well as what has to happen in the philanthropic community as well. But really there’s an underlining theme here that Nicole points out, which I just want to show it to amplify is that we’re running out of time. We need action and we need progress. And we are on the precipice of doing something really interesting to help solve this, but we need to act now. So, we’re going to hang some of her articles on the website so you can see them, but I hope you enjoy the conversation.

Jon Powers:

Nicole, thanks so much for joining me on Experts Only.

Nicole Systrom:

I’m so excited to be here, Jon. It’s great to see you again.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. So I want to talk a little bit about your fascinating background and sort of what led you to do what you’re doing today. As we were talking offline, you grew up in Chicago, moved to California for school. Have you always been interested in the environment?

Nicole Systrom:

Well, so, I grew up in a town on the shores of lake Michigan. So I always loved being outside, but I would say it was actually, as I was growing up, all of the kind of national parks that we traveled to mostly Yosemite here in California, that really, I think made me really sort of understand the power and majesty of the planet and nature. That was really exciting. And then in college I think is really where my whole interest in working on the planet and the environment as my life’s work really kind of came into focus.

Jon Powers:

That’s amazing. Yeah. You went to Stanford. What did you study at Stanford?

Nicole Systrom:

I was an earth systems major, which is an interdisciplinary program and environmental science and policy and economics. I would say I was a student who I really was interested in lots of different topics. So part of the reason I wanted to go to Stanford was because Stanford is lucky to let students take classes wherever they want to take them. But I didn’t know about the earth systems major before. I just took the intro to earth systems class just to fulfill a general, like the science requirement. And I got in the class and I was like, oh my gosh, this is the coolest thing. This is amazing. Can I just take class four times a semester for the rest of my… So I’m in college. And so I figured I should major in it and it was awesome.

Jon Powers:

That’s amazing. Yeah. And so we were talking before, you ended up interning for basically the version of EPA within San Francisco. And it sounds like in that experience, you were doing both environmental stuff, but you were also engaging in the business community. Was that a plan you had, or did that just sort of happened to work out and it really sort of opened your eyes to the business side of it?

Nicole Systrom:

Well, I think one of the major benefits of the earth systems program was that I felt like it really trained me to think about solving environmental problems from a very holistic perspective. You can’t just look at the biology of here’s how a forest grows and what it needs to regenerate itself. You also have to consider that people are going to live near that forest and they’re going to want to eat. And we do get some things out of forest, which are good for society. And so I think from very early on in my academic career, there was definitely that seed planted of don’t just look at the geology or don’t preserve polar bears for the sake of preserving polar bears, understand how humanity, how society interacts with the planet. And the business community is a huge part of that. So, yeah. Yeah.

Jon Powers:

As you’re sort of moving throughout your career, was there a moment for you that went from the idea of the environment to climate change? What sort of triggered your interest in that? Because we’re talking sort of late 2000s, transitioning into 2010.

Nicole Systrom:

Yeah. Yeah. So that was also in college. So my, I would tell you, my degree is in earth systems, but it was really all my classes were about climate change. There’s their title and then there would be like subtitle climate change, or a third of the class would be about how climate change affected whatever it was that the topic of the class was about. I graduated in 2006, which was like run up to an inconvenient truth coming out, which at that time, you’ll remember it was like the height of public awareness about climate change. So kind of that’s where I got… I was like, do I care more about this? Or do I care more about oceans or whatever? And then through college, it just kind of came to the place that climate is the thing that affects all of those environmental issues and at the root of all of it. So decided that’s where I wanted to spend my time.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. Well, first of all, glad you’re doing it because it’s critical for all of us. So in that process, you started focusing on a variety of things career-wise. Now you’re really focusing on, and we’ll talk about more of this later on on investments and how folks are really moving capital into the space longterm, but you sort of professionally grew up in and around Silicon Valley being where you live. And it’s a place where people are taking bets on how fast we can get downloads of an app so that they can quickly monetize this in two to three years. What for you was the trigger point mentally to say, okay, because this is not how clean energy works, right? We’ll talk more about that later. But that the idea that this more patient capital, this long-term investment strategy was really critical.

Nicole Systrom:

Well, let me back up a little bit. I would say I started my career in the nonprofit sector, working on policy, working on forest carbon offset policies that could basically create a revenue stream for forest owners to keep their forest standing, moved to a little company called Terra Pass, where we were generating carbon offsets for sale. And part of the whole idea behind Tara Pass was that we were going to get some laws passed that would make carbon offsets incredibly valuable. And that was when, I mean, I remember the day at Terra pass when Waxman-Markey, the big climate bill of that era was being voted on. We literally projected C-SPAN on the wall and watched the vote as a company. And then of course what happened next, it didn’t pass the other Chamber of Congress. I can’t remember, I guess it started in the Senate. And then it just didn’t pass the House.

Jon Powers:

No, it passed the House. It didn’t pass the Senate. It was Carrie Graham and those guys who weren’t able to get done.

Nicole Systrom:

They just couldn’t get it passed the Senate. And that was really how young and naive I was, a really devastating day for me. But I think what that did was it sort of sparked in me this idea that I don’t know, it pointed up to me the benefits of the private sector, where you can be nimble, where you can move quickly, where if you have a good enough idea and enough people like it, you don’t have to have a policy that’s driving it. So that took me down a path of what can the private sector do? How do we make the case to business leaders that this is the right path to go down? So I ended up going back to business school and doing research at business school on these topics.

Nicole Systrom:

And after business school focusing more broadly on bringing more resources into this space and the more you get into it, the more you understand, I guess the other sort of atmospheric thing that was happening at the time was it was kind of 2010-ish, 2008 to 2010-ish, that was also the height of the clean tech 1.0 venture capital investment wave, which was where Silicon valley thought, okay, we’ve got this internet thing also. Now we know what we’re doing here. What else do we need to do now? Green tech, it was called at the time, green tech. Not clean tech. And so there was a lot of, I mean, Terra Pass was venture invested. It was a venture company, venture investment.

Nicole Systrom:

And so that wave was also sort of cresting as I was entering and going through business school where all of those venture investors were realizing that like, oh, we didn’t really quite-

Jon Powers:

I can’t exit in three years from this, what’s wrong?

Nicole Systrom:

I thought this battery company would be just like an app. And although we didn’t call them apps at the time, it would be just like a software company and surprise, they’re not. And so that really started me thinking about what are the other kinds of capital sources that are needed for clean energy companies and technologies and what is the actual path to getting these technologies to growth and scale?

Jon Powers:

Yeah. So you started your organization, Sutra Energy Group, and you sort of work with a variety of folks, right? You work with Prime and Energy Foundation.

Nicole Systrom:

Yeah.

Jon Powers:

Can you talk a little bit about the effort of Sutro and how you got started and some of the things before we get into the other conversation, I would love to hear more about your efforts there.

Nicole Systrom:

Yeah. So I would say I started Sutro after business school and it was never my intention to start it. I think I just…

Jon Powers:

What does Sutro stand for by the way?

Nicole Systrom:

So Sutro is a reference to when I founded the company, I lived in San Francisco and Sutro is just, I was going to… Well, this is a funny story. I was going to name it the Chutes Energy Group. And my boyfriend, now husband looked at me and said, you really want to name it that? So I was like, oh, oh, okay. Okay. I’ll take the hint. I’ll stay with Sutro instead, which is just Sutro is a kind of a San Francisco cyan and so that’s really where the name came from. Just really as I need to name this. What’s the name?I didn’t really think much more about it than that.

Nicole Systrom:

I got it started really after business school, I graduated off cycle because I did an extra degree in environment and resources. And so then I was kind of looking around, I missed the recruiting piece that business school often kind of to, and just as I was taking a little bit of a breath, I had friends and colleagues just kind of start to call me up and say, Hey, I have this project. Would you do this project for me? There’s this question I need to answer with respect to some aspect of our climate investment work. And so I just started doing a bunch of essentially consulting projects and decided that I really liked it. And I really liked how I could have my hand in different areas and sort of learn a lot about what people were doing and the NGO community and the business community, and think about philanthropy and investment. And so I just kind of rolled with it and I’ve been lucky to have lots of fun projects to work on all sort of aligned around bringing more resources to climate positive activities and companies. And yeah.

Jon Powers:

I mean, you’re working with some really incredible groups. I mean, you look at whether it be Series or Energy Foundation or Prime, and really some of the most forward leaning organizations thinking about this. So I do want to talk for a second about your recent article on the World Economic Forum. It was really interesting. And first of all, I think there’s often a long conversation on finance and climate and energy, not always around climate as a whole. So whether it be agribusiness water, I do like the way you sort of hit on a variety of different pieces there. We do focus heavily obviously here on energy.

Jon Powers:

One of the things you talked about, there’s sort of two key requirements for sort of decarbonizing the economy by 2050. And I want to go into these a little bit. One is the massive investment in innovation in areas like electrification and long-term storage. And then of course, investors who are patient enough to see this pay off. I think that there’s two different pieces there, right? We talked a little bit earlier about the venture community not looking at this as a traditional sort of short term ramp up in exit. And then two is who’s investing in the longterm sort of assets that are building the foundation across the country. So let’s tackle the first one first. We’ve seen a progression with the breakthrough effort with Gates and others. What else are you seeing in the venture community that gives you hope that there is capital moving into that longterm sort of patient structure around venture?

Nicole Systrom:

Yeah, well, I mean, I think one thing, well, just like a foundational thing that gives me hope is I think people have their eyes open now about what it takes to build and grow these companies. And so that’s good. I think the pendulum, I mean, we can talk about this more if it’s interesting to you. When I think about green tech 1.0, everyone saw that these investments will exit just as fast as software companies. And in fact, we are investing in companies that will/are relying on policy, that we are going to get a carbon tax passed and then this company is going to be a rocket ship.

Nicole Systrom:

And then of course those policies didn’t get passed. And then we had this huge backlash, don’t invest in anything related to policy. Don’t even talk to me about policy. If you pitch me, if your pitch has anything about policy in it, done. It’s in the pile. I think now the pendulum has sort of swung back to an understanding that policy is important and I don’t think any company wants to put forth a business plan that is entirely dependent on some policy occurring somewhere, but you need to be able to take advantage of policy. And I think investors are starting to understand that. I think we’re in a better place with respect to that.

Jon Powers:

There’s a Strategic advantage if you understand policy, and especially now it’s such a state level game, if you can figure out where the markets are going to develop ahead of time, you’re a hundred percent right.

Nicole Systrom:

Yes.

Jon Powers:

So key to what I’m working on.

Nicole Systrom:

And well, just as a side note, I think one of the issues now is that, my hypothesis, and I wonder what you think about this and the kind of projects you work with is we now have a generation of entrepreneurs though that have been trained to not think about policy. So everyone’s relearning or needs relearn or re-engage. So I think there is a whole kind of area of training that we need to ramp back up for entrepreneurs, but that’s sort of a side note.

Jon Powers:

No, I 100% agree with you. I feel like you often, also though have entrepreneurs that are coming from maybe an engineering background, or a pure finance background where they’re looking at the markets, but not looking at how do you get some of the blocking and tackling done to make sure the framework is right where you can actually build a project in a place like.

Nicole Systrom:

Yeah, yeah, yeah, no, for sure.

Jon Powers:

I think you’ll appreciate this. When we were raising our series A, cleancapital was going out and we sort of positioned ourselves as a FinTech company and we had trouble getting traction in the clean energy venture space. They were really pushing us to do more for instance on crowdfunding when we were talking to FinTech investors and we ended up getting a whole series of FinTech investors into our series A, they just saw a new asset class. Like oh, we don’t know anything about solar. Can you tell us about how this works? And once we educated them on what PPA was, they’re like, oh, this is awesome. And we didn’t really have any clean tech investors, or very few in our series A. We have raised since then but we only had basically FinTech players who came in.

Nicole Systrom:

Well, I guess I would say that’s another thing that gives me hope is people are seeing how climate is more than just one thing. And there’s so many solutions that we need to address it. We can develop all the great technology we want, but if we don’t have the right financial instruments to deploy that technology or manufacture it, who cares? So I’d say that’s another thing. Another thing is you mentioned breakthrough, there have been a bunch more funds raised that are entering the space. And my view is that they’re mostly in the growth stage, so there’s still a challenge at the very early part of the kind of first steps out of the lab, part of the innovation spectrum, but there are many more funds out there, which is great. Ans the other thing, which I think is adding to that, which is hopeful is we’ve got Tesla now which shows that you can build a great big fat, sexy company that is good for the environment. So those are all good things.

Nicole Systrom:

I also think just going further down this kind of financial innovation path, there is more kind of growth venture money, but I also think there’s recognition now that clean tech companies often need different kinds of capital in addition to venture. They need project development finance, or just other kinds of investment capital to get companies in the first deployments, first projects, first plants. And then, I mean, you guys are a part of this revolution, but once you get to the point of your technology is mature enough, how you just kind of get that technology out the door and being able to have a pool of capital so that a homeowner can finance solar on their roof without having to put 30K down? Great.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. I mean, I think the idea for us is I always refer to as deployment capital. The more we can get the cost of capital down to get these projects in the ground, the more we have the long-term mentality that I think 2008, 2010, 2012, people didn’t know what a power purchase agreement was. Couldn’t spell PPA. They didn’t know if solar panels lasted 20 years like they talked about. But now you have this massive corporate demand calling for projects and people committed with good credit to pull the power. It’s interesting to see the divest movement that’s happened along the long-term institutional investors. And I think we’re just at the precipice of the investment where they’re starting to now put their money where their mouth is in terms of putting the capital at work.

Nicole Systrom:

Yeah. I also think just on the corporate note that there’s definitely more interest among the big industrial corporate players to engage with earlier stage technology, because again, this isn’t like an app where you put it on the app store and a bazillion consumers download download it, or pay you 30 bucks a month, or whatever it is. Many of these technologies, the ultimate buyer is a corporation. Either at the technology or the way that the technology can most effectively is by acquisition. So having a generation of entrepreneurs and innovators who are skilled in interacting with large corporations, we’re starting to see that happen as well, which is great.

Jon Powers:

Let me pivot for a second to another focused on philanthropy.

Nicole Systrom:

Yep.

Jon Powers:

Because there’s been, I mean, especially now, we are both doing this interview while somewhat sequestered in our house because of COVID. And so it’s an interesting time, and as people are thinking through how they’re going to be investing their philanthropic dollars, what has to change there and we can take it out of just energy for a second, but to really drive the climate solutions we need so that in 2030 and 2050, we’re looking back and seeing this as a decade of growth and answers.

Nicole Systrom:

Yes. Well, a lot of people look to philanthropy as sort of like philanthropy will fix this. Philanthropy will fill this gap. And when I say a lot of people, what I mean is people outside of philanthropy. I can’t tell you how many conversations I’ve been in where I’ve been in a room and it’s like a bunch of investors, or maybe it’s some investors and corporate folks. And they’re like, oh, we have this big gap here and no one wants to pay for it. What do you do think about philanthropy, Nicole? Can philanthropy?

Nicole Systrom:

That being said, philanthropy is a precious resource. And I think smart philanthropists want to be sure that what they are investing in, especially when it comes to climate is an area that gets them a lot of leverage, a lot of bang for their buck. And so to date, most of climate philanthropy has been focused on policy, which is great and wonderful and a very smart-

Jon Powers:

And when you say that you’re sort of advocating and trying to drive change to policy.

Nicole Systrom:

Yeah. So like-

Jon Powers:

Energy Foundation.

Nicole Systrom:

Yeah. Energy Foundation is a great vehicle, a great example of this, providing all of the technical support and analysis so that the right kind of policies are designed and eventually get passed. Right?

Jon Powers:

Right.

Nicole Systrom:

As a way to level the market, level the playing field, develop markets for we’ve already talked about policy and its effects on innovation in this conversation a couple of times, so that’s great and wonderful, and we absolutely a hundred percent need it and everyone should go vote, please vote. Vote at the federal level, vote at the state level, if you care about climate, make it a voting issue. But philanthropy is a unique… I think we also, from now speaking from the philanthropic world, we also have to face the fact that all of the wonderful work that climate philanthropy has done in the past 20 years, which has had a very, very large impact on our world trajectory for sure. It’s not enough. We’re not getting there fast enough. So what then as philanthropists, can we do, how can we be more creative? What new things can we try? And I don’t know, I think we need to acknowledge the fact that policy is it’s not enough on its own. It’s so important and it’s not enough.

Jon Powers:

Especially when it can be completely undercut by a new president.

Nicole Systrom:

Yeah. When it can be completely undercut by a new president or it’s also just… the other thing I think about a lot with climate these days is we’re just running out of time here. We can’t wait 15 years to get it right. We just have to start doing it. And I think one of the things that is really wonderful about philanthropy is that it is a pile of capital that the whole goal of it is to achieve some societal benefit, like some societal impact. Right?

Jon Powers:

Right.

Nicole Systrom:

And when it comes to climate, you can give that money away as grants or you can start to ask yourself, are there ways that we can inject philanthropy into the capital market system in ways that kind of juice things up and bring other sources of capital to the table? I loved your story about how your first round was mostly FinTech funders. It wasn’t climate funders, or I guess, clean tech funders at the time. Can we use philanthropy in smart ways in kind of tiny amounts, but in ways that make an investment or a project or a program demonstrate its worthiness for mainstream investors to come along behind the philanthropists and kind of grow it to scale?

Nicole Systrom:

And I would go even a little bit further there, most philanthropists kind of have this wall between what’s the program money, what’s the grant charity money and then how does the investment capital that foundations, donor advised funds are growing to provide that charity money to give away?

Jon Powers:

Yeah.

Nicole Systrom:

I think philanthropy is going through this really interesting moment where people are really starting to look at we only give away 5% of our money every year. This other 95% is sitting there, what is that doing? If we’re invested in oil and gas markets and our portfolio and the profits from that is what we’re using to give away to charity, that seems not productive. So I’m really excited to see so many philanthropists really kind of start to think that through, and at the end of the day, all of that money, both the investment capital and the grant capital is supposed to have an impact. It’s tagged for impact. It will go to impact eventually. And so what can philanthropists do today to actually start making sure that that’s all working towards the ultimate climate goal we want right now, instead of in the future sometime?

Jon Powers:

Yeah. That’s fascinating. And I love the fact that you sort of framed it up as we’re running out of time and really thinking through getting some of these next tier solutions at the table so that it won’t need philanthropic dollars or impact dollars. It just becomes an asset that people are investing in because it makes sense. It’s like insurance companies looking at climate as a risk issue. Right?

Nicole Systrom:

Exactly. Yeah.

Jon Powers:

They’ve known it for 10 years. They’ve seen it coming, they haven’t been addressing it, so.

Nicole Systrom:

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

Jon Powers:

Nicole, this is fantastic. Listen, it’s been an awesome conversation. I love the work you’re doing and want to find ways to help elevate it because it’s so important to the dialogue that we’re having right now as a country. If you could go back to yourself in Chicago before you headed out to Stanford and could sit down, or maybe when you’re graduating Stanford and can have a beer or a coffee when you’re in high school with yourself, what piece of advice would you give yourself?

Nicole Systrom:

Well, I think probably the main piece of advice I’d give myself is that life is long. We’re not fixing this problem in five years. It’s not like a college career Where you after four years, you graduate and you get your big, shiny star that you did it. That climate is so much bigger an issue than you think it is right now. And I mean, one thing we didn’t even really get to talk about in this conversation so far as I would say I started being passionate about climate change from the perspective of, oh, I love the mountains and I love the oceans and whales and polar bears and happiness. This frog deserves to live its life. And I’ve really in the past five, ten years really transitioned just to the belief that climate change is like, yeah, it’s great. I love the planet, but this is about people and our safety and I’ve got young kids now. We’re already seeing massive amounts of people displaced from climate related disasters, influences. It’s hard to tie anything specifically to climate, but when you kind of zoom out, you’re like, well, what other explanation could there be?

Nicole Systrom:

And so I guess that the advice I would give myself is you got to figure out or just be aware that this is a lifelong project, and you’ve got to figure out how to engage in it in a way that is sustainable for you so that you’re not…

Jon Powers:

It’s good advice.

Nicole Systrom:

It’s so funny to me, when we talk about that day, the Waxman-Markey bill day. And I remember being so devastated after the bill didn’t pass the Senate. And I mean, at that point, Jon, it was early in my career. There were people that had been working on climate change for like 20 years. And so the fact that Waxman-Markey even passed the House was the big, huge, apex commit, the achievement of their climate careers. And just so the advice I would give myself would just like, you’re 22 and you have no perspective, try and have some perspective.

Jon Powers:

No, it’s good. It’s so funny. You keep talking about them because I actually didn’t get into climate until literally that moment. I had been in the military and then had started to write on climate change. And National Security had a piece on Huffington Post that was read by someone in the Senate. And I ended up testifying to the Senate right prior to that vote on the national security implications of climate change. And that was the trajectory that launched the rest of my focus.

Nicole Systrom:

Wow.

Jon Powers:

But also seeing that fail for me was just this unbelievably enlightening moment where I watched moderate sort of blue dog Democrats who had voted for climate getting crushed by the oil companies politically, and realizing that we didn’t have an infrastructure as a movement yet to really start to fight back against the status quo. And hopefully it’s changing. And I’ve been working to do more around that. I serve on the board of EDF and some other places trying to drive some of that change. But it’s just so critical for us to act as a grownup institution now, we’re not just hoping to get this done, but we’ve got to be able to battle the status quo each every day, so.

Nicole Systrom:

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

Jon Powers:

Nicole, thank you so much. This has been awesome. Love the work you’re doing. And I want to just thank your team for the effort they put in helping to put this together. Melanie, Victoria, thank you so much for that. And our producers, Courtney Flynn and Carly Baton. For all those listening, you can get more episodes at cleancapital.com and we’ll make sure we hang Nicole’s articles so you can access them and see some of the great stuff she’s putting out. So thank you so much.

Nicole Systrom:

Thank you. It was really, really fun. Great to talk to you.

Jon Powers:

Yeah.

Jon Powers:

Thanks for listening in today’s conversation. Find more episodes on cleancapital.com, iTunes or wherever you get your podcasts. If you liked what you hear, be sure to subscribe and leave us a five-star review. We look forward to continuing our conversation on energy, innovation and finance with you.
[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’default’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’50’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” av-desktop-hide=” av-medium-hide=” av-small-hide=” av-mini-hide=” id=” custom_class=” template_class=” av_uid=’av-29lu5b’ sc_version=’1.0′]

[av_social_share title=’Share this entry’ style=” buttons=” share_facebook=” share_twitter=” share_pinterest=” share_gplus=” share_reddit=” share_linkedin=” share_tumblr=” share_vk=” share_mail=” av-desktop-hide=” av-medium-hide=” av-small-hide=” av-mini-hide=” av_uid=’av-354olk’]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_button label=’More Podcasts’ link=’page,5266′ link_target=” size=’small’ position=’center’ label_display=” icon_select=’no’ icon=’ue800′ font=’entypo-fontello’ color=’theme-color’ custom_bg=’#444444′ custom_font=’#ffffff’ av_uid=’av-jx1x7jx3′ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

Episode 72: Navigate Webinar #2 – Opportunities for the Next Decade

[av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/podcast-image-pageheader2.jpg’ attachment=’4329′ attachment_size=’full’ copyright=” caption=” styling=” align=’center’ font_size=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ animation=’no-animation’ hover=” appearance=” link=” target=” title_attr=” alt_attr=” id=” custom_class=” av_element_hidden_in_editor=’0′ av_uid=’av-jwwgyb48′ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’20’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgxszg’ admin_preview_bg=”]

Episode 72: Opportunities for the Next Decade

[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’10’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwl4lsb2′ admin_preview_bg=”]
This week’s episode was produced in collaboration with the New England Clean Energy Council (NECEC). The second Navigate program webinar of 2020, “Opportunities for the Next Decade”, was made possible with support from NYSERDA. Navigate is a program under the Northeast Clean Energy Council that leverages its power to provide resources and support for clean energy startups.

Host Jon Powers leads a discussion with four panelists: Jason Kaplan of PowerMarket, Noah C. Shaw of Hodgson Russ LLP, Doran Hole of Ameresco, and Zoe Berkery of CleanCapital. Listen to hear expert opinions on the future of the renewable energy industry and what experts see on the horizon for the next decade. 
[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” font_color=” color=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwh5253′ admin_preview_bg=”]

Listen now:

[/av_textblock]

[av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ExpertsOnly-bar-Necec2.jpg’ attachment=’7691′ attachment_size=’full’ copyright=” caption=” styling=” align=’center’ font_size=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ animation=’no-animation’ hover=” appearance=” link=’manually,https://link.chtbl.com/RrWpmx8E’ target=’_blank’ title_attr=” alt_attr=” id=” custom_class=” av_element_hidden_in_editor=’0′ av_uid=’av-k37p0z0j’ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock textblock_styling_align=” textblock_styling=” textblock_styling_gap=” textblock_styling_mobile=” size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” template_class=” av_uid=’av-l6c895oj’ sc_version=’1.0′ admin_preview_bg=”]

Transcript

[/av_textblock]

[av_textblock textblock_styling_align=” textblock_styling=” textblock_styling_gap=” textblock_styling_mobile=” size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” template_class=” av_uid=’av-l6c8b7z5′ sc_version=’1.0′ admin_preview_bg=”]
Jon Powers:

Welcome to Experts Only podcast, sponsored by Clean Capital. You can learn more at cleancapital.com. I’m your host Jon Powers. Each week we explore the intersection of energy, innovation, and finance with leaders across the industry. Thank you so much for joining us.

Jon Powers:

Hey, this is Jon Powers and welcome back to Experts Only. Today we have our second episode in a partnership with the New England Clean Energy Council and their navigate webinar. We have a really fascinating conversation about the renewable energy industry and the opportunities over the next decade. We’ve got a phenomenal panel, include Doran Hole, who’s a senior vice president and chief financial officer of Ameresco, Noah Shaw, who;s partner and co-chair of the Renewable Energy Practice at Hodgson Russ based in New York. Zoe Berkery, who’s the vice president of assets here at Clean Capital and Jason Kaplan, who’s the chief operating officer for Power Market Solutions. Hope you enjoy the conversation, really focusing on how we’re going to get to help solve our climate crisis over the next 10 years.

Caterina Marida:

Hello everybody. And welcome to the second webinar of the Navigate Webinar Series from the Northeast Clean Energy Council in collaboration with Clean Capital. Thank you Jon, for being with us today and moderating this session dedicated to renewable energy. My name is Caterina Marida, and I run Navigate. This webinar series has the unvaluable support from all Navigate sponsors, such as the state agency NYSERDA who works to advance energy innovation, technology, and investment in New York State. Thank you so much for your support. Before passing the word to Jon, I’d like to kindly remind you to stay on mute, to avoid any sound problems. Please feel free to use the Q&A feature or questions, feature on Go To Webinar to send questions. And I’d like to advise you as well, that at the end of the session, we’ll receive a very short survey. Thank you for completing it and sharing your feedback with us and Tweet with us throughout the webinar using the hashtag NCC Live and the handle Clean Capital underscore and now it is my pleasure to hand over to Jon Powers and Clean Capital co-founder and president. Thank you.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. Thank you so much, Caterina. Thank you everyone for joining us today. This webinar today is also going to be recorded as part of the Expert Only Podcast, which focuses on the intersection of energy, innovation, and finance. Really excited today with the topic of renewable energy opportunities for the next decade. Our webinar will focus on the future of renewable energy, highlighting technological advancements, innovation opportunities, policy changes, other things that are going to really catalyze the growth and continue to sort of transform our energy sources.

Jon Powers:

What I really want to do is explore the future of what the next decade looks like, but also step back and look at the last decade and look at the just incredible growth we’ve had. And we’re lucky to have amazing panelists who have deep expertise and are working for really incredible companies working to change the face of our energy picture here in the United States.

Jon Powers:

The last decade was remarkable. It was game changing. 10 years for the renewable energy industry, it went from it being a nascent alternative energy to a mainstream energy in many areas, the cheapest cost of power. The US has twice the renewable power generating capacity today compared to a decade ago. And for instance, there’s 80 times more solar capacity online today than at the start of the last decade.

Jon Powers:

Many of us do this because we want to help address the climate crisis. And some numbers are really show the progress we’re making. Coal went from meeting 45% of the US demand in 2010 to just over 20%, 23% in 2019. The carbon intensity, the power sector continues to decline. The last decade it fell over nearly 25%. We still have a ton of work to do. And I do want to look forward at the future here, but I do want to step back with our guests and look back, have them have a little bit of work they’ve done in the industry and how they sort of see the growth of the space. So I’m going to first start with Doran Hole, who is the senior vice president and chief financial officer at Ameresco. Doran, you’ve got a deep history in the industry. You’re now working for one of the most respected public firms in the space. Can you talk first talk a little bit about your background and how have you seen the industry change in the last 10 years?

Doran Hole:

Sure thing. Thank you, Jon. Thanks for having me and thanks everybody for joining. So my interest in the renewable energy industry started probably right around 10 years ago. In 2010, I was working for Deutsche Bank. We were starting to pitch debt service and tax equity with respect to large utility scale projects. And I do recall one opportunity in particular that Sun Power was pushing at the time in Southern California as being kind of what kicked it off. And from there, I just became fascinated with the potential for deployment in, especially in the solar space, seeing Sun Power, seeing Sun Edison, seeing Sunrun, Vivint, all these residential solar companies, solar cities start to proliferate, structured credit techniques that we were working on such as securitization and realizing that there was a tremendous amount of potential for cleaning the basically cleaning the grid.

Doran Hole:

And so in up 2015, I decided to step out of the banking industry and move directly into industry. So I spent a few years working directly in solar on the development side. That was all both in the kind of CFO role, as well as a CEO role. Most recently at in North America. Joined Ameresco about one year ago and saw there an opportunity to really see a company that was a leader in energy efficiency and quickly expanding in renewable energy, across a number of technologies, not just solar, but also combined heat and power, renewable natural gas, and within the energy efficiency space, seeing it deploy technologies as an independent integrator into any number of basic energy efficiency measures, boilers, chillers, HVAC systems, all the way to LED lighting controls, micro grids, battery storage, solar, taking this energy efficiency concept and using the financial that have been enabled, especially energy savings, performance, contracting energy savings agreements to help kind of really expand and help customers offset their carbon footprint and save money.

Doran Hole:

Ameresco itself is leading energy efficiency solutions provider, probably 1,000 plus employees. We’re, we’re spread across the country in 70 plus offices operating in the IS and Canada and the UK and peripherally in a couple of other places in Europe. We’re tracking carbon footprint with over 11 million metric tons of CO2 in 2019. I think across our projects and our projects that we’re installing on behalf of customers, as well as the energy assets that we own, we’re owning and operating approximately 250 megawatts worth of plants. So that’s a mixture of landfill gas, landfill gas going direct use, landfill gas going into electricity, solar, little bit of battery storage standalone, as well as a good bit of renewable natural gas. So very exciting time for the company as we see the market opportunity growing across all of the advanced technologies, smart buildings, again, more demand and potential expansion in renewable natural gas, and then the battery storage and micro grid opportunity, the resiliency opportunities are quite strong.

Jon Powers:

Fascinating, look forward to talking more about sort of the next phase of that. And I want to go next to Noah Shaw. Noah’s a partner and co-chair of the Renewable Energy Practice at Hodgson Russ based here in New York. But Noah and I have long track record. We’ve both worked in the Obama administration and Noah later went to serve in the Cuomo administration. Noah, you’ve seen the good that the government can do in this space, helping to capitalize the market and really helping it grow. Talk a little bit about your experience in the public policy space and sort of the role of sort of policy over the last 10 years to help the market grow.

Noah Shaw:

Thanks, Jon, and thanks for the invitation to be here. And it’s great to talk to everybody. When I joined the Obama administration in 2012, I actually joined the Department of Energy because I had a, well in part, because I had a background in government investigations and there was a little company called Solarendra that was having some problems in California and a couple others. And I came from which many of you are, I’m sure, well familiar with, but over time, especially after I got to know Richard Kaufman reasonably well, who was senior advisor to the Secretary for Finance, I started to move into more of the actual implementation work, working with the loan programs office, working with the office of energy efficiency and renewable energy, working with the domestic policy council and CQ, and to put together the climate action. When I think Jon, you and I ended up in conference rooms in ELB few time together on that, and it became very clear to me that this was a train that was on tracks, that people really couldn’t even fathom the potential of.

Noah Shaw:

So when I got the opportunity to come up to NYSERDA and be general counsel where I was general counsel from 2014 through last year, I actually walked out the door just as the governor was signing the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act, which is sort of the signature climate law for New York State.

Jon Powers:

Just dropping the mic and walking out the door.

Noah Shaw:

I had, my role was the lawyer role, but it was a great time to leave. And you could over the course of that period of time, the trajectory and the cost declines and the technology advances and the business model maturation that you saw, frankly, outstripped anything that anybody could have predicted. And in particular, you look at the cost curves related to offshore wind, or you look at where utility scale solar is, and what’s happened with utility scale solar, even in a place like New York over the course of the last couple or three years, I think it puts a lens on what’s going to happen in the next decade, sort of in a place where the unpredictability should be welcome.

Noah Shaw:

I mean, as we were writing the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act and talking about 85% greenhouse gas reduction by middle of the century and 100%t clean energy in New York state by 2040, there were a lot of naysayers out there who said, “That’s not feasible. How could you possibly write something into law that, where the technology just doesn’t get us there right now?” And I think the answer to that is unless you put those markers down and unless you have faith in the advancement of technology, which we shouldn’t have faith in, because it’s exceeded our expectations year over year, every year for the last 10 or 15 years, you’re not making good policy. So what I see coming up and what we at Hodgson Russ do, Hodgson Russ is a New York based firm, but we also have offices in Toronto and down in Florida and Albany and New York City, I’m sitting in Saratoga Springs right now.

Jon Powers:

Buffalo.

Noah Shaw:

Buffalo. Yep. The flagship.

Jon Powers:

Center of the universe. Yeah.

Noah Shaw:

We represent a broad spectrum of both government and developers and investors looking to acquire, looking to build, looking to understand the regulatory framework within various different markets, bulk storage, distributed solar utility scale solar, onshore wind, offshore wind. In fact, I’m happy to say, be able to say today that we were just engaged by the state of Maryland to help them update their regulatory structure for their offshore wind program to get to their goals, their recent legislation, the Clean Energy Jobs Act in Maryland from last year. So we’re across the spectrum. We’ve got a great team that’s dedicated solely to renewable energy plus regulatory and transactional issues. Plus all the folks who support us in the real estate shop and the environmental shop and the litigation shop when that is needed, because building a project, as everybody knows, is a multifaceted exercise.

Noah Shaw:

So throughout that you sort of get this, the aperture of the perspective of this kinds of technologies that are needed and which ones are headed in which directions is becoming more clear and less clear all at the same time, right? We know which models really work now, but we also know which technologies aren’t quite mature enough. Let’s say long duration storage. Let’s say a lot of grid tech and transmission technology, certain floating offshore wind. Those are the sorts of technologies that as they mature are going to open up whole new markets and whole new sets of sort of opportunities over the course of not only the 2020s, but also frankly, the 2030s, because a lot of our view for a lot of the progressive states goals is more 2040, right?

Jon Powers:

Yeah. I mean, one of the reason I wanted to focus on this next decade, because I think because the goals are 2040, 2050, whether it be some of the progressive states or you have some states going 100% renewables in those windows, we won’t get there unless we chop wood here the next 10 years and continue to sort of scale at the rate we’re doing it. I want, I want to go sort of our next panelist and look back at the last 10 years. And so the next 10 years for a second about really opportunity in this space, Zoe and I have been working together for a long time. Noah, when I was at the White House, Zoe actually interned for me at CEQ before going on and creating an incredible career and becoming part of Clean Capital later.

Jon Powers:

First of all, Zoe’s a VP of asset management here for the team of Clean Capital. You’re an emerging leader in the industry, but you’ve been in the policy space, now the sort of the finance space, now you’re managing almost 200 megawatts of distributed energy systems. How have things changed for folks looking to get into the industry, starting looking back to where you were coming out of college to an internship. Did you ever imagine sort of what this space could look like today? And then what advice do you give folks looking to get into sort of the next iteration of the industry?

Zoe Berkery:

Yeah, thanks Jon. So I think it’s interesting and this will come as no surprise to folks that in 2012 and I was working at CEQ under the Obama administration, it was just a very different landscape when it came to policy and the support that the global industry and clean energy as a whole was receiving. At CEQ we were looking on working on a whole host of executive orders and the cafe standards that were so impactful. After CEQ I worked at the Business Council For Sustainable Energy. That was almost, during my tenure there was almost solely focused on the Clean Power Plan and the Paris Agreement, neither of which are in play any longer in this country. But what’s interesting is that, well policy is so incredibly important. I think the markets in the private sector have really spoken on this and they haven’t really skipped a beat. Larry Finke at BlackRock’s letter at the beginning of this year, stating that he sees the climate crisis as reshaping finances as we know it and continuing to do so for the foreseeable future, I think can sort of sums it up very well. I think Clean Capital has also kind of was started on that with that mission of bringing more investments into the cleaner reduced space at large.

Zoe Berkery:

So as Jon mentioned, I’m involved, the New York chapter leader for RISE, which is the renewable, Women in Renewable Industries and Sustainable Energy group, as well as involved with CELI the Clean Energy Leadership Institute. So I’m sort of constantly having conversations with young professionals looking to get into this space. And it’s interesting that even just 10 years ago, I think folks are thinking about it in such a more holistic lens. I think policy innovation, technology, finance are all part of school programs now, whereas it used to just be policy or you were in engineering or you were in finance. And I think where all of those are coming together is just incredibly impactful for the industry and I think we’ll see that shaping in the coming years.

Zoe Berkery:

I’ll also add, I think there is, especially given the current events going on, I think there’s going to be a larger push to increase diversity in the energy and finance industries and clean energy finance as well. Where those overlap, I think we could have an entire series of webinars on the benefits that will bring to the industry as well. And I think young folks are really thinking about that and that climate change isn’t just about climate change, there’s environmental justice aspects as well that I think folks getting into the industry are more focused on than previous. So I think we’ll see that kind of being a larger part of the conversation as well.

Zoe Berkery:

And I’ll add, I think now there is a whole new set of challenges for the industry. We have an aging renewables fleet where we’re seeing conversations about repowering popping up left and right, that wasn’t really a conversation a few years ago. Clean Capital now has as Jon mentioned over 500 million in assets under management, 184 megawatts across 124 projects. And we’re thinking very critically on how we get the most out of those facilities and how we can I guess, also harness better technologies going forward and increase efficiency along the way.

Jon Powers:

Excellent. Thank you. And we’ll dive more into that in a little bit. And then finally, Jason. Jason Caplan’s a chief operating officer for Power Market Solutions, but Jason, you’ve got a sort of an immense background in this space and decided to go into one of the most exciting sort of emerging markets, we’ll hear around community solar. Before diving into power markets and community solar, can you talk a little bit about your background and sort of why you decided to enter the fray of the community solar space.

Jason Caplan:

Thanks, Jon. And thanks for everybody for joining. Yeah. My road to power markets, definitely a windy one. I really kind of wanted to be in this industry really because my background, I graduated from Vermont Law School and with a degree in environmental law and policy and I wanted to affect change, right? I came out sort of bright eyes in 2008, 2009 and there was no opportunity for young lawyers to do that, affect change. Fortunately, I landed in a law firm that was doing some environmental law, but it was really around kind of super fund litigation for those who are not familiar with super fund litigation, essentially I was helping a client for who should for the contaminated property. Really these things can go on for years, and that was not kind a change that I was hoping to affect. And I really wanted to push my career into renewable because really that’s where I felt like the development of these clean energy assets would be of greatest benefit to us as a society and to really kind of clean our grid.

Jason Caplan:

I found my way to a small startup company called United Wind, which we were developing small wind energy turbines really up in upstate New York. And I really got trial by fire working for developer really in kind of a nascent technology. One that, frankly, distributed wind is sort of, I would say the redheaded stepchild of the renewable energy industry. But nevertheless, we were able to secure financing with the New York green bank with developing over 100 small wind turbines across upstate New York. And again, I got that experience that I’d never had before in understanding the risks and challenges there is in developing renewable energy assets in New York, but certainly broadly. I came to Power Market really through a connection I made through the Clean Start program, which is a program that is an NYU certificate program in renewable energy, but also facilitated, sponsored through the Urban Future Lab, which I also have to give many props to the Urban Future Lab.

Jason Caplan:

Pat Sapinsley, their executive director and Joe Silver and Jiro and the team there, frankly, they have enabled the growth of clean energy in the state through the incubation of some of the most prominent clean energy startups. I love working in the clean energy, the clean tech, the clean startup world. My wife might disagree in terms of the high risk, high reward elements to it. But fortunately I found my way to Power Market really through those connections. The Urban Future Lab is sponsored from NYSERDA and National Grid and they do a tremendous job there to support these young, clean energy companies that are coming to help solve some of the biggest challenges. And so certainly anyone who on this call or the webinar, who’s a young clean energy entrepreneur and maybe one person or a team of three or so and want to kind of get the support and kind of be a part of a community, certainly look at their Urban Future Lab and feel free to connect me after this to give you some intros there as well.

Jason Caplan:

But frankly, through that, they’ve helped Power Market was a resident of the Urban Future Lab for, I think now four, well it was four years, maybe five years. They’ve been a little longer than typically companies are, but we just loved working there because everybody was fantastic and supported us. Power Market as a company, we are a turnkey servicer of community solar projects throughout the country, wherever really community solar exists. We provide services of the subscriber, acquisition, education, enrollment, billing, and support for those who are developing and owning community solar assets, whether that be third party developers, energy retailers, and even utilities. Some of earliest clients at Power Market, and this is going five years, we’ve been part of this industry, the likes of Rocky Mountain Power in Detroit Edison, that we’re building out regulated utility markets, a product to offer community solar to their customers.

Jason Caplan:

No doubt over the last three or so years, the market has really been driven by third party developers, independent developers of these assets for which we’re working very closely with, the most prominent really in the state of New York and broadly. Right now we’re working in nine states, we’ve got 150 megawatts of community solar under management. And just last year we provided kind of over $3 million worth of billing to solar subscribers through our portfolio. And it’s no doubt a market as you kind of indicated, Jon, that is really in its infancy, but it’s really on the precipice of explosion and really looking forward to talking more about the work that we do at Power Market and really the community solar market generally.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. I mean, community solar is a great example of something, I think when, if you went back and interviewed someone in 2010, wasn’t even on people’s radars as an idea, and it could be really a game changer in here in the next decade. I’m going to use that to sort of transition into the … There’s a series of rounds of questions for the audience. First, I’m going to talk a little bit about policy and then sort of corporate demand and demand that’s been changing out there and a couple other sort of key topics. If you have questions, please put them into the question feed and we’ll get to them as we go, but I’m going to keep the mic as a moderator here in the beginning and sort of dive into the first round, which I do want to focus on policy.

Jon Powers:

Noah, you’ve been living in the federal, we have the last few years been living in sort of a federal policy drought around energy policy. After there was extensive movement in the first half of the decade to get things moving, but the market continues to grow, and projects continue to be built and we continue to scale. What do you see as the federal policy here for the next 10 years as we sort of work towards 2030?

Noah Shaw:

Well, that’s a big question.

Jon Powers:

I only ask big questions now.

Noah Shaw:

I’ll probably repeat a little bit. I’ll probably cheat a little bit and just pick a few things that I think are really important. One is we have to get the standalone storage tax credit figured out. The fact that standalone storage is not eligible right for an ITC is ridiculous and that needs to be fixed. I remember when I was at NYSERDA, we actually did a as part of our sort of state advocacy, we did a calculation of the savings to rate payers to reach the goal versus how that bill was scored. And it wasn’t even close. I mean, it was so clearly a value to rate payers, not to mention the industry that there just aren’t a lot of good rationales, frankly, for not moving forward with that, especially as storage becomes, and potentially long storage becomes so much more important to grid. And to the next item, which I’ll talk about, which is fixing sort of transmission policy, not to mention the moper and other sort of wholesale market issues that have thrown a lot of uncertainty and complexity into folks’ long term revenue predictions.

Noah Shaw:

I don’t know that the industry necessarily needs every little ask that it throws up on the board, but it does need certainty. It does need at least the hope of consistency between and among jurisdictions, if not between zones. I mean, even within the there are different rules that apply in different zones. That sort of the rationalization and the reformation of the FERC sort of position with respect to renewables or other asset resources that receive state subsidies, I think is absolutely essential for, for scaling of especially storage.

Noah Shaw:

And the next technology that I’ll talk about, which is offshore wind. Offshore wind also is right now without much support from a tax policy point of view, that credit needs to be re-upped in part and in large part, because not only is there an extraordinary potential of that industry to support the decarbonization of grids up and down the east coast and frankly on the west coast once floating technology is economic, but the economic development and jobs potential of that industry, frankly makes everything that we’re doing look like tiddly-winks. You’re talking thousands and thousands and thousands of jobs for each project where the average salaries are in the six figures. You’re talking about supply chains into the, if we reach the goals between the east coast states over a hundred billion dollars and companies from all over the world, looking to make the east coast sort of the hub of that industry for decades to come.

Noah Shaw:

So those sort of items, I think from the federal level tax policy, with respect to storage and offshore wind, and bringing some rational decision making and consistency to the FERC with respect to both transmission and the ability of renewable resources to clear in the capacity markets, I think are sort of the first and most important things to do. And I have no doubt that if there is a, I have little, well, I have no doubt that if there is a change in the administration this winter, those items will be at the top of the list of the people who are tackling this stuff in the White House and the agencies involved.

Jon Powers:

Excellent. Now, Doran, Ameresco’s got an extensive national footprint. You guys are playing in. I’m not sure at all 50 states, but a majority of them and you guys have seen firsthand the importance of the state roles and developing these markets, but it makes it challenging because you’re sort of managing 50 different fiefdoms and understanding the roles of policy and net metering or permitting or whatever in those states. First talk a little bit about the roles of states sort of in the next decade. And then are there specifically any emerging markets that you’re excited about at the state level that you guys really see sort of opportunities of scaling?

Doran Hole:

So I think the, I mentioned it in my opening comments we have about 70 offices around the country and we feel like that local presence is what makes a huge difference in terms of our ability to navigate all of the local needs, whether it be permitting or interconnection rules or simply contracting environment because we are, especially in the energy efficiency space, our core customer base is quite a lot of government customers, federal government, municipalities, states, et cetera. The state governments themselves do have a role in terms of leading the charge for what incentives and where dollars need to be going in terms of greening their own economies. And as a result we do spend quite a bit of time with state governments. We of course, since the early years of the company, when it was founded in 2000, had been following this energy savings, performance contracting framework, which is a financing tool to allow customers to finance their energy efficiency projects using the savings that will be generated in the future as measured by an audit of the energy systems. That is something that is enabled by state legislation in a number of places, and the federal government has its own kind of set of rules as it relates to that.

Doran Hole:

I think the states also continue to be important in terms of setting out frameworks for renewable goals. And for example, the low carbon fuel standard in California has been an important player in the development of renewable natural gas and will continue to be. You see Oregon starting to talk about implementing something like that. You see, in fact, north of the border, I believe a couple of the provinces in Canada considering similar things. So I think those state incentives are quite important. I would, however, go back to the fact that getting things done in these markets really requires local presence and local people who are members of the community. They are connected, whether it be politically or just environmentally being stewards of their own communities. Those are really important characteristics of being able to carry out what it is we collectively as a industry trying to do.

Doran Hole:

In terms of specific markets, so we have deep involvement in local policy making, I guess, committees, some of the industry groups especially in the Northeast, of course, the company founded in Massachusetts. So the Northeast and New England are big parts of our overall market.

Jon Powers:

Is your biggest footprint in Boston?

Doran Hole:

Go ahead. Biggest office is in Boston.

Jon Powers:

Yeah, yeah.

Doran Hole:

Yeah. Our biggest office is outside of Boston. We’ve for years done energy efficiency and renewable energy installations, both solar landfill and traditional energy efficiency and some of the advanced technology, energy efficiency projects for a number of municipalities, hospital systems, universities, et cetera, in the state. And that’s not alone though. We are a regionally managed company. So whether we’re developing renewable energy projects to put on our balance sheet and sell the power to sell the renewable natural gas, or we’re doing an energy efficiency project for a particular client, those projects, those opportunities are effectively made by the same kind of groups of origination and sales people that we have spread around the country. And so it’s kind of a collective, regionally managed group of sales folks. And I think it’s important to manage the company that way, because the technical expertise also needs to be local, understanding how to engineer projects in Southern California is very different than the design and engineering of a similar project in the Northeast.

Jon Powers:

Imagine market wise how to get your permit moving through a certain utility is a lot different in a place like Colorado than in New York, than Massachusetts.

Doran Hole:

Of course. And as we all know you’re not going to send a guy with a Boston accent out to a town hall in the Midwest to try to get a permit. We’ve probably all experienced that in one way or another. We do see opportunities across the board in multiple markets. There isn’t any particular region, we see opportunities for additional energy efficiency, renewable energy. It’s still in Massachusetts, they’ve been a very forward thinking state, New York, especially as our cooperation with Power Market is coming fruition, variety of other states that we think they’re a good opportunity.

Jon Powers:

Excellent. Thanks, Doran. And so I’m going to skip ahead to technology here in a second, cause we’re getting a lot of questions about technology from folks, but before doing that, I think we’d be shortsighted if we don’t talk about community solar as a policy and the important role that it has both in helping it grow the marketplace, but also providing opportunity to sort of all different levels of the social economic community get involved in clean energy for the first time. Jason, can you talk a little bit about, first of all, explain to people that they may not know, what is community solar? How’s this sort of viewed in these different states, how’s it sort of coming together? And then with that, I do want to hit a little bit on the topic of sort of that creating opportunity for all to be part of the clean energy space.

Jason Caplan:

Yeah. So community solar really is sort of the pure sense of democratization of participation in clean energy. Most people from a residential mass market perspective, when they think about clean energy, they think about the big wind turbines or large solar projects, or even solar on a roof. But no doubt that excludes everybody who either is a renter or a student, maybe the pitch of the roof isn’t right. Maybe the roof’s shaded, but they still obviously are really eager to participate in our community future. And so how can they possibly do that? We always think like, “What’s the thing I can do to really affect change and be a part of that?” Community solar really is that answer because really the only, not the only, but one of the fundamental eligibility criteria is that have utility account. Most people do. And what community solar is, is you would sign up to be a participant in a community solar project, which is a larger solar project between 500 KW to five megawatts, that’s a project that’s installed somewhere within your utility territory.

Jason Caplan:

So if you live in Manhattan, there may be a two megawatt solar array located in Westchester within the ConEd service territory. And theoretically you’d go to powermarket.io\marketplace, and you’d find all the different community solar projects that may be located in that utility territory for which you live. And you can click and learn that really by signing up by putting in your basic information, your name, email address, utility account, number, some other details, and signing the, what we call a subscription agreement, you can join a community solar project without any installation on your property, without any disruption. And the fundamental value proposition to community solar is that once you’re enrolled on project, essentially that solar array is being developed and constructed. You have no obligation to do anything. There’s no, you don’t have maintain it, you don’t have to worry about it.

Jason Caplan:

Once That project is operational and putting clean energy into the grid, your utility will applying credits onto utility bill, commensurate it with your participation. And when I say participation, we call it sort of the allocation that you have to a project. And what companies like Power Market does is that when you initially apply to join one of our community solar projects, we’ll look at your last 12 months of energy usage to see based on how much energy you use, how much of that solar array should we apply as a credit to your bill. And so really this is kind of where we talk about the nuances between different states, because community solar fundamentally is a state enabled program. The legislative bodies in New York and Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Maryland, New Jersey, wherever it is, sort of state based. And so you unequivocally see differences in the way that community solar is rolled out in those states.

Jason Caplan:

Some of the fundamental nuances really around kind of how are community solar credits valued? In states like Massachusetts, there’s sort of a fixed value that when you as a community solar developer apply and you get a statement of qualification, you get sort of a number that’s, here’s the value of every kilowatt hour that’s to be generated from my community solar project for the next 20 years. In states like New York. However, we have something called the value stack or the veter credit. And there’s no doubt elements within that value stack. And trust me, I do not want to get involved in kind of going through each of those elements and how they’re valued.

Jason Caplan:

But nevertheless, there’s variability there. And certain elements of that value stack can change over time. And so we look at just the way that these programs roll out. You also look at the subscriber side in terms of how should certain community solar projects be subscribed. Should they be focused on commercial subscribers. So if you look at a state like Minnesota, the way that the program was kind of built, sort incentivized, kind of just having a relatively small number of large commercial offtake as being kind of the participants of community solar, you look at a state like New York, however, because the value of those credits are dependent on the rate class of those off takers, having residential rate takers and small commercial rate takers are more beneficial. And so you see much more mass market residential customers participating in community solar in New York.

Jason Caplan:

And so for a company like Power Market, we need to have our finger on the pulse of how the different state policies will affect how we go about acquiring and engaging customers. Because ultimately for us, we want to optimize the value of our community solar projects for our clients. And so it’s critically important that we understand all the nuances and the rules of can we have an anchor subscriber. In New York State, you can have 40% of your community solar project taken up by one or many sort of demand meter anchor subscribers, the remaining 60% taking up small residential mass market non demand subscribers. In Massachusetts, again, differently you can have 50% percent your project, not 40% so I really all to say is that in different states, the rules are different.

Jason Caplan:

The primary fundamental nature of what community solar is though is the same. And from the customer, the participant perspective in that by participating, you are supporting clean energy. You are joining a community solar project in your community. You’re getting credits applied your bill. In some states, we will charge you for the value of those credits at a discount. So you might get $100 of community solar credits on your bill, in a month and charge you $90, the value of that $100, thereby saving you $10, or that guaranteed 10%. Because in another month you might only, you might get $200 worth of credits and we’ll charge you $180 for it. So you’re always getting that guaranteed 10% savings.

Jason Caplan:

There are states though, like Rhode Island and really, and soon be New York, where the credits are being consolidated, meaning that instead of having to pay for credits, you’re going to see those credits applied your bill and that’s it. I said, you get a credit for $100 right now, and we’re charging 90 for it in New York, in about nine months, you just might get a credit for $10, applied to your bill and that’s it. And so again, the thing about community solar is we’re still in that infancy where the rules are changing. The policies are changing. We are very active in New York on the billion credit working group because no doubt, even states like New York and Massachusetts, which have the most mature community solar markets, there’s still opportunities to create efficiencies and to find challenges where we’re operating on the ground, engaging with the individual subscribers, seeing kind of the pain points that they’re feeling relative to how credits look on their utility bill, how bank credits may look and what even bank credits means. And so we want to make sure that community solar, as a program can be optimized for kind of all stakeholders. But no doubt, each state has their own ways of kind of going about it.

Jon Powers:

So I just want to one follow up question. Actually, I want to put to Noah on this. Well, first of all, Jason, I’m glad you guys understand it, because it sounds really confusing and I’m glad Power Markets can help folks like Clean Capital, just find those off takers so we can just manage the projects. I know you worked on this at NYSERDA and this is why I’m sort of putting in your direction, renewables face criticism for not being accessible to all communities, communities of color, social economic status. What role does community solar play in helping to address that? And are there other efforts that you’ve seen briefly that is helping to sort of drive that change?

Noah Shaw:

I think, so when Jason was talking, I was remembering sitting in my office at the Department of Energy in 2012 or ’13 and a friendly analyst from NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory, walking into my office, Dave Feldman, some of you may know what I’m saying. Only about 25% of the people in the country can actually put solar on their roof. The rest is the community solar opportunity. And my mind was just like, I don’t even know what this community solar is, but that is incredible. And we spent, my first interaction was it was fighting with the SEC ultimately I think successfully to make sure that they didn’t consider community solar subscriptions or interests to be securities. And then shortly after I got to NYSERDA we got to work drafting the order, the issue in middle of 2015, authorizing community solar in New York State, and I’ll either take credit for, or deny having authored some of those words, depending on what the issue is.

Noah Shaw:

It is an incredibly versatile tool. That’s what I’ll say. I’ll say that community solar by itself, just as a sort of the fundamental sort of integral model doesn’t necessarily help with the democratization and the access to renewable energy for low and moderate income or community disadvantaged communities or others. You have to actually frame the rules around the model in a way, and provide the incentives to the market participants to point in that direction. So in New York, obviously we have a number of adders and other incentives that are not just for community solar, but for solar in general, that try to drive towards disadvantaged communities, try to drive towards areas that have been historically ignored or that have been inaccessible for these purposes, but there’s still a long way to go in that regard.

Noah Shaw:

Cross utility crediting is an enormous opportunity for, for example, large communities downstate, as we say, here in New York who don’t have access where there’s no there’s very little community solar in ConEd, as you might expect, not a lot of opportunity, but if they could subscribe to facilities that were upstate, obviously that greatly expands the ability of community solar to solve some of these problems.

Noah Shaw:

There are definitions and questions that get super weedy really fast about what kinds of customers can qualify as either mass market or demand metered and how those sorts of organizations can participate or other customers can participate. There’s a lot of progress that we can make there to open up community based organizations and others who may be demand meter, but who want to stay at a relatively small subscription allocation allow them to participate at more scale. There’s a lot of progress that needs to made, I don’t want to discount or otherwise minimize the incredible growth in the market, both in the states where this has been adopted, I think pipeline for community solar in New York state is far outstrips, frankly, any other than utility scale, but any other distributed model.

Jon Powers:

Yeah, we’re seeing so many.

Jason Caplan:

I was going to jump in real quick because it’s all about public implementing public policy to affect that change. And so while maybe New York and Massachusetts were some of the earliest community solar markets, you’ve got states like New Jersey that are really putting forth the public policy goal of inclusion of low to moderate income participants in community solar, really as a prerequisite to actually have your community solar be eligible to participate in their community solar pilot program.

Jason Caplan:

We’re involved in the New Jersey program with some of our clients that were awarded in that first round and really fundamentally everyone, every developer in that award had to essentially certify that they would have 50 or more percent of that solar project taken up by members participants of the low to moderate income community. And so that was sort of a directive, a policy directive, that was implemented into the rules. And so you see that change happening in New Jersey, no doubt, a great example of that. Maryland, certainly Massachusetts, you’ve got sort of a low income adder to the extent you want to get be incentivized to have those participants on your project. So I think we’re seeing kind of that migration, that maturation of solar policy to bring what ultimately, what I think all of us want to have happen is, is truly making community solar for all and putting really directly into the rules itself.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. Excellent. I want to spend a little bit of time on customer demand, but I’m reading so many questions about technology, I’d be silly not to jump into technology, but just to make a point, I mean, we’re talking a lot about supply here. One of the biggest game changing things that have happened this last decade and we’re seeing moving forward is the change in corporate demand when you’ve got significant renewable commitments by major companies that are not only helping to change the face of the projects being built, but also the policy landscape, when they can go into places like Virginia and demand, they won’t bring their warehouses there or their data centers, unless there’s clean energy. That’s a factor that could be a whole conversation in itself. I do want to jump forward to technology. We have a lot of questions from folks on things like combined heat and power, on renewable natural gas, on fuel cells.

Jon Powers:

Really looking at the speed and the change of technology in this last decade, it’s not about the amount of efficiency the solar panels have increased in the last 10 years, it’s about unexpected changes that are outside of our ability to change, like the internet of things and how the internet of things is allowing companies to manage energy as a service on a campus. Energy storage would be great, but if you can’t manage the deployment of that energy storage, because of the way the internet things is has grown, it’d be much harder to really maximize the financial impact of those deals.

Jon Powers:

So I want you to think about technology for a second. And my question is going to be and I’ll start with Zoe and then sort of go around the horn. What are sort of the one or two really interesting things that you see developing and on the horizon that you think will be not just a nascent technology today, but standard practice in 2030> and I’m going to ask you, Zoe, actually, I want you to focus specifically on bringing new technologies into existing projects, right?

Zoe Berkery:

Yeah.

Jon Powers:

Because we’re going to have PPAs that were assigned in 2010, that will be expiring in 2030, but you’ll have rooftop, you’ll have panels. There’s really interesting things we can start to do with it. So

Zoe Berkery:

No, absolutely. I think a huge piece of that, I mean, there’s a PPA that was signed 10 years ago that has a 20 year life so we’re halfway through, 10 years old. The landscape, which that facility sits in could look very different. Utility rates have changed, many utilities have increased demand charges while decreasing their rate for energy. So that can actually sort of skew how a PPA is then perceived or how valuable that now 10 year old PPA is to a rural school district in Colorado, for example. So things like being able to more easily add battery storage to that facility, to lower those demand charges often for a small distributed system in a state that doesn’t have sophisticated or ambitious battery storage policies, that battery storage addition is not really feasible as it is right now. So I think there’s a lot that can be done on that front that’s not just isolated to Massachusetts and California.

Zoe Berkery:

We have solar all across the country and we’re only going to have more, so we need those policies to sort of keep up with that. And then the lowering of how expensive the battery storage is and having the right policies in place to add that on can help while some of the changes that are happening on the landscape locally.

Jon Powers:

So yeah, no, that’s helpful. And Doran, Ameresco’s one of the unique firms in the space, because you’re an integrator, right? You’re not just a solar developer or a wind developer, you’re in energy efficiency, micro grids, storage. You guys are doing really amazing complex deals. What sort of excites you, so the next generation of technology that’s going to help you take these projects to your customers?

Doran Hole:

So I would say that look the expanded deployment of storage and micro grids when combined with either combined or solar and certainly there are other technologies that are going to come forward there. That in and of itself is what I see. The incorporation of resiliency is going to be a really huge piece of this puzzle. Let’s say fast forward 10 years, you would see the proliferation of micro grids kind of throughout the country. I think a really important component of that of course is going to be the pace of deployment that might be driven by the incentive. Noah mentioned the ITC for batteries, but honestly we have to get cost down. We have to get cost down to where the economics can make sense. Ameresco has had the ability to stay ahead of the technology often by virtue of the fact that we’re installing battery storage and micro grids and solar and CHP as part of a comprehensive energy solution portfolio in performance contracts, which means that no particular party is relying on some variable revenue streams to support its financing. The finance is there because of an energy savings and performance contract.

Doran Hole:

We have an installation in South Carolina, Paris Island, Marine Corps recruiting depot. So that just completed its first year of operations and that micro grid with combined heat, power and solar and battery storage. And we have been able to measure out some really, really solid savings of energy and cost, of course, for the federal government. The federal government customer is not your everyday customer for the rest of the country. And so we need to have those incentives in place to allow for the broad deployment.

Doran Hole:

Now, moving beyond that, what do we see coming? Certainly I think that the green hydrogen is going to be a topic of conversation going forward. We need, of course, dollars going into research and development bring down the cost of electrolysis, et cetera, to make that something that’s actually viable. But again, when you’re looking, when you’re sitting here and looking forward 10 years, all we can talk about is what we think will move the market toward mass deployment of these technologies, right? It’s our job as, I guess, combatants of, frontline combatants, of climate change to turn the theoretical into the possible. So I think we need to direct policy and that’s what we’ll use to the forefront.

Jon Powers:

Can I ask you a question in your CFO hat? The ESP, energy is a service for folks that aren’t familiar, the energy savings performance contract is sort of this holistic energy service contract that the federal government does where they pay the cost and they save energy and they’re allowed to do it. It really hasn’t taken off in the public sector as much, or I’m sorry, the private sector as much as for instance, PPAs, right? Do you see sort of a emerging financial tool that will allow that comprehensive, for the simplest way to say it, a PPA for a micro grid or energy as a service becoming more standardized so that we can finance them to scale here the next 10 years?

Doran Hole:

It is coming, Jon. So where

Jon Powers:

Well, tell me how to do it when you’re ready. We want to finance.

Doran Hole:

So where you’re seeing it work for the non municipalities, so everyone can look at the CNI market and understand that their planning period, they look forward for where they’re going to measure energy savings is maybe five to seven years, right? That’s why, when you look at the corporate participation in the electricity market the PPAs are shorter tenure and that’s because the planning periods are shorter. So much energy conservation measures actually produce good results there. Well, it’s the ones that have short payback periods like lighting, right? That’s where it started to gain some traction. I think that when you think about some of the other energy conservation measures that say the federal government will do, those things actually have much longer payback periods than as a result of that. That’s CNI market. It’s hard to apply that.

Doran Hole:

So the challenge we have as kind of a finance community is to come up with a product and financing sources that can look past these short term planning periods and figure out how to, customer that there is a financial benefit. And in my mind, the first two things that come to mind, first is what is the price you can put on resiliency? And right now that’s market by market. The second is-

Jon Powers:

Company by company.

Doran Hole:

… what is the price … Right, true. And the second is what is the price that you can put on carbon reduction? We don’t have a carbon tax now, but people are publishing papers. A lot of think tanks going after trying to figure out where that sits. And I think that collectively the finance community needs to really just figure out how it likes and can underwrite the cost of carbon, convince customers that is part of the equation that they need to be thinking of. When you think about California, wildfire season, why companies are willing to pay for resiliency? Well, after all of the shutdowns last year, suddenly a lot of the people in companies there actually can really get down to dollars and cents of what that costs them to have no power.

Doran Hole:

I think those are the elements that need to be folded into the conversation now. So I do feel like it’s coming, but as I said, shorter payback period measures, it’s starting to gain traction, but for now that tool remains popular and remains feasible in the what effectively is the mush market, the municipal higher ed, university market. I mean, it’s the market’s taking its own turn with the energy as a service. You’re seeing some of these concession agreements, large steel by Ohio State, for example, kind of future opportunities in the university space. And I think Ameresco, our view is simply, we’re going to continue to chase that market as a leading integrator of technologies. We want to be able to bring that forward, but we are going to continue to maintain relationships with financial partners to allow them to understand and underwrite the financing of those projects.

Jon Powers:

Yeah, no, that’s great.

Doran Hole:

And again, I hate to go back to this again, but Jon, the numbers have to pencil for these institutions to be interested, right. And in order for the numbers to pencil, costs need to come down and the costs come down with large deployments. And I think the United States has a choice here when it comes to manufacturing, are you going to put incentives in place to allow you to be the one who can bring that low cost to battery storage, green hydrogen, whatever it is that’s next, so that you don’t end up where we are with solar panels today, where China rules the whole thing? Because the government, they took it and made it their own deployments, went out the roof and cost went down.

Jon Powers:

Fascinating. I’d add one, and the cost of capital needs to keep coming down and people are getting more familiar with these technologies, the cheaper cost of capital who will begin to move where there’s certainty there. So the more we’re proving these out, the more we’re going to hopefully get pension funds and others investing these long-term assets. So we’re really short on time here. And I just wanted to, Noah and Jason, if you got a quick technology on a reference before we wrap up.

Noah Shaw:

I don’t think I’ll just say transportation. Obviously there’s a lot of opportunity from a technology point of view there. It’s not even worth going much deeper, but I think in the grand scheme, that is where a lot of the action in the 2020s is going to be on the technology side.

Jon Powers:

Yeah, this, I mean, first of all, this has been a fascinating conversation and I think we could do this for another hour. There’s so many other topics to cover. I really wanted to thank our panelists for their insights and thank the audience for their questions. You can get more episodes of Experts Only at Clean Capital’s website, cleancapital.com. Really hope to continue this conversation, because as I’ve said before, I think the next 10 years of this, the next decade for our industry is really going to be critical so we can hit our climate goals. And I really wanted to thank everyone on the panel today for their thought leadership on this and the work they’re doing every day to help solve this. So thank you. Thank you to NECEC and Navigate for sponsoring the webinar. Caterina.

Jon Powers:

Thanks for listening in today’s conversation. Find more episodes on cleancapital.com, iTunes or wherever you get your podcasts. If you like what you hear, be sure to subscribe and leave us a five star review. We look forward to continuing our conversation on energy, innovation, and finance with you.
[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_social_share title=’Share this entry’ style=” buttons=” share_facebook=” share_twitter=” share_pinterest=” share_gplus=” share_reddit=” share_linkedin=” share_tumblr=” share_vk=” share_mail=” av-desktop-hide=” av-medium-hide=” av-small-hide=” av-mini-hide=” av_uid=’av-354olk’]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_button label=’More Podcasts’ link=’page,5266′ link_target=” size=’small’ position=’center’ label_display=” icon_select=’no’ icon=’ue800′ font=’entypo-fontello’ color=’theme-color’ custom_bg=’#444444′ custom_font=’#ffffff’ av_uid=’av-jx1x7jx3′ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

Episode 71: Chad Farrell

[av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/podcast-image-pageheader2.jpg’ attachment=’4329′ attachment_size=’full’ copyright=” caption=” styling=” align=’center’ font_size=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ animation=’no-animation’ hover=” appearance=” link=” target=” title_attr=” alt_attr=” id=” custom_class=” av_element_hidden_in_editor=’0′ av_uid=’av-jwwgyb48′ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’20’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgxszg’ admin_preview_bg=”]

Episode 71: Chad Farrell

[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’10’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwl4lsb2′ admin_preview_bg=”]
This week’s guest is Chad Farrell, founder and CEO of Encore Renewable Energy. He is a developer, project manager, and engineer with over 20 years of experience in the industry. At Encore, Chad works towards the development of alternative energy and the redevelopment of contaminated sites. 

Host Jon Powers dives into Chad’s past experiences, how he started Encore, and the company’s role in the energy transition. They discuss some interesting topics such as brownfield development and pollinators. 
[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” font_color=” color=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwh5253′ admin_preview_bg=”]

Listen now:

[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’20’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-k4so2umi’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ExpertsOnly-bar-Farrell.jpg’ attachment=’7644′ attachment_size=’full’ copyright=” caption=” styling=” align=’center’ font_size=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ animation=’no-animation’ hover=” appearance=” link=’manually,https://link.chtbl.com/wrkIMLEP’ target=’_blank’ title_attr=” alt_attr=” id=” custom_class=” av_element_hidden_in_editor=’0′ av_uid=’av-k37p0z0j’ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwh5253′ admin_preview_bg=”]

Full transcript:

Jon Powers:

Welcome to Experts Only Podcast, sponsored by CleanCapital. You can learn more at cleancapital.com. I’m your host Jon Powers. Each week we explore the intersection of energy, innovation, and finance with leaders across the industry. Thank you so much for joining us.

Jon Powers:

Welcome back to Experts Only podcast. I’m your host Jon Powers. Today we talk to one of the nicest guys in the renewable energy industry, Chad Farrell. Chad’s the CEO and founder of Encore Renewable Energy. He’s got over 20 years of experience in the space, developing projects. We talk a lot about his amazing background, the work he does passionately in Vermont or on climate, and of course the incredible work Encore does developing projects. I hope you enjoy the conversation, and as always, you can get more episodes at cleancapital.com. Thanks. Chad, welcome to Experts Only Podcast.

Chad Farrell:

Thanks, Jon. It’s tremendous to be here. Thanks for the opportunity.

Jon Powers:

Yeah, absolutely. Just to set the stage for the audience, Chad and I are interviewing this in the middle of the coronavirus pandemic, so we’re both sort of working out of our home offices. There’s a lot going on in the industry. We’ll definitely talk on some of that.

Jon Powers:

But, Chad, I’m want to step back. You grew up in the Boston area, decided to go to school for mechanical engineering at Bucknell. Talk about what led you to Bucknell, how did you decide to get into the engineering side of things?

Chad Farrell:

That’s a good question, going all the way back to Bucknell. I was a competitive swimmer growing up, and I think Bucknell had a good team, and I was sort of recruited to-

Jon Powers:

Because it sort of in the middle of nowhere, Pennsylvania, right?

Chad Farrell:

Yeah. I certainly didn’t go there for the cultural offerings of Lewisburg, Pennsylvania. So, mainly it was a good school. It was one of the better schools that I got into. I was recruited to swim there and I really liked Bucknell because, yes, I did end up studying engineering, but I remember thinking, well, they’ve got really good liberal arts and good engineering, that seems like a pretty good place for me to land at 17, 18 years old, not knowing what the heck I want to do with my life.

Chad Farrell:

So it was a good experience. I still have lifelong friends that I’m very close with from Bucknell. We’re supporting each other through this crazy new reality of COVID-19 and have a couple of different text chains going providing moments of levity and humor throughout the day. Yeah so-

Jon Powers:

My college buddies and I all joined a workout app for no reason, just to push each other every day.

Chad Farrell:

Yeah.

Jon Powers:

Should we go run? Actually, my wife and I had just started at Peloton before this, and thank God, because it’s been huge.

Chad Farrell:

I’ve got my bikes out. Here in Vermont, I mean, there’s still snow on the ground from the other day, but there’s people outside bundled up riding around on bikes. So I’ve got a couple of bikes I got tuned up and I’m meeting some folks at 5:30 later today. Stay six feet apart.

Jon Powers:

Yeah, social distance.

Chad Farrell:

But ride and push each other a little bit. Yeah, for sure.

Jon Powers:

So you leave Bucknell. For folks that don’t know, so my wife and I used to drive through the Bucknell basically monthly, between going from Buffalo to Washington. Beautiful part of the world, for sure.

Jon Powers:

So you leave Bucknell, you go back to Massachusetts, and you sort of get involved. We talked to you a little bit about joining and working on brownfields. How did you decide to go that path?

Chad Farrell:

Yeah. So, boy, there was an economic slowdown going on when I came out of college. I was fortunate to get a job in the environmental engineering field, which was a field that was growing despite that slowdown early on. So I got a job with a environmental engineering firm because I knew AutoCAD and I was helping doing drafting. I mean, it’s an entry level job. You take what you can get when you’re 22 years old. But I really came to like the work, and obviously learned more on the job. As a lifelong environmentalist, I think it spoke to my interest in sort of cleaning up the world and protecting it for future generations.

Jon Powers:

Was there any inkling at that point of the idea of using this to develop something else? Or was it still just learning the economy there?

Chad Farrell:

No. Quite frankly, as a young professional in my twenties, I got to work outside a lot, which was really great. But I really enjoyed it, and I really wanted to learn more about it. Right? I mean, I think you just scratch the surface of things in the undergraduate experience. So I knew that going back to graduate school would allow me the opportunity to really dig deep into a field of study that I was quite interested in.

Chad Farrell:

I applied to a number of different schools. The University of Vermont had the best program, as well as the best sort of financial package for me. So I decided to matriculate to Burlington way back in 1995. The outdoor environmental community here speaks to me, so I was able to leverage that graduate school experience into another couple of jobs.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. So what did you do coming out of University of Vermont?

Chad Farrell:

Yeah. I ended up working for a company over in Montpelier that was doing actually international work around brownfield assessments and cleanups.

Jon Powers:

Oh, interesting.

Chad Farrell:

We were supporting other industries as they were trying to assess their environmental liabilities globally, so I actually got to travel around the world. This is before kids and before things changed. You can be gone for two, three weeks at a time and it was an exciting career path for me for a while.

Chad Farrell:

It did introduce me, I think, as the early 2000s rolled around, this concept of repurposing environmentally challenged or contaminated sites for more traditional forms of real estate development, really started to gain traction. I think that stirred additional interest in me to sort of take the next step in my career, which was to learn how to take some of the harder engineering skills that I was using and employ them in more of a development kind of arena. Project management, development, really taking a big complicated project and breaking it down into a number of different manageable pieces and tackling it.

Chad Farrell:

And I learned a lot about just process and project management, things that I just wasn’t exposed to directly through my schooling. But really, had some good experiences, worked on some interesting projects.

Jon Powers:

So let me ask you a question before we get into the Encore stuff. With that sort of background, coming to it as an engineer and now sort of seeing projects being developed, working on them, diving in, how has that experience helped you now as a sort of a CEO when you’re overlooking whether it be develop a pipeline, or just a company budget, right? I mean, you’re touching so many parts of-

Chad Farrell:

Yeah, I think it’s really a process, right? I think it was gaining the tools that allowed me to sort of map out a process. If you think about it as a solar project or an energy storage project, you take a project from concept to commissioning, and how do you map out that whole process and how do you do it in a way that various resources can plug in throughout the process along the way?

Chad Farrell:

So we’ve got a Stage-Gate model where we break down the whole solar development process into a series of stages and decision points or gates. We get to one of those decision points and make a decision, whether it’s a capital commitment meeting or something, and we go through the gate if we are all aligned and feeling comfortable. So we’ve mapped out that whole process. We also call it value stream mapping.

Chad Farrell:

A lot of the work that we’ve done at Encore over the last couple of years, I know we’re jumping ahead a little bit here, but it’s all around trying to systematize the platform, right? To make it a little bit more… allow different employees, allow different professionals, to kind of plug in to the process, regardless of who that individual may be, right?

Jon Powers:

Yeah.

Chad Farrell:

This is the process, whoever is plugging in here knows what the process is and knows what to do.

Jon Powers:

Yeah, honestly, that’s a major component of CleanCapital, right? We view the process really is efficiency, right? So the more efficient you can do these DG projects, the better you can finance them.

Chad Farrell:

The more margin there is, the better the returns.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. Whatever. Let’s jump into Encore. So you started Encore about 10 years ago. First of all, what was the impetus? How did you decide that, okay, I’m going to start my own company developing solar?

Chad Farrell:

Yeah. Well, so in order to answer that question, I think just to jump back to sort of my postgraduate school experience, which was working on these brownfield sites and then realizing that, you know what? I think this project development, I think that would be an interesting place for me to go.

Jon Powers:

Right.

Chad Farrell:

So really Encore was formed as Encore Redevelopment, and the whole objective was to redevelop brownfield sites for commercial real estate endeavors. The world changed again in 2008, right?

Jon Powers:

Right.

Chad Farrell:

We got the news that Lehman Brothers had failed, and I’ll never forget that moment driving in the car, hearing NPR, Lehman Brothers just failed. Wait how is that possible?

Jon Powers:

Right.

Chad Farrell:

So the world changed at that point the way it’s changing right now.

Jon Powers:

Where were you in that stage? Where were you in starting the company?

Chad Farrell:

I had done a couple of projects. I was probably a year in. I actually started Encore Redevelopment in August 2007.

Jon Powers:

As you?

Chad Farrell:

As me. I hired a couple of interns from Middlebury and UVM to help delegate some of the blocking and tackling. I mean, it was amazing. Some of these interns built some of the initial financial performance for Encore.

Jon Powers:

Right.

Chad Farrell:

Hour of interns, new job. But anyways, I think, well, what happened was, as a result, then there was the election, the Obama administration had to create all kinds of stimulus programs, as you know. And many of them were anchored around clean energy and clean tech. And so the proverbial light bulb went off over my head. So I guess I should also mention that at that same time, the governor here in Vermont, Governor Peter Shumlin, ran on and won on basically a climate economy kind of platform. Where he was looking ahead and seeing renewable energy, solar and wind at that point, as potentially being transformative for the Vermont economy.

Chad Farrell:

And he was dead on. So anyways, those two signals really caused me, again the light bulb went off over my head. I knew I had to go to the school of hard knocks to learn solar. Solar design-

Jon Powers:

Everyone did though then, right? I mean, really-

Chad Farrell:

Right, exactly. I was not unique. So yeah. So Vermont initiated a standard offer program. It was the only feed-in tariff program in the United States at the state level. City of Tallahassee had a program and Ontario up in Canada had one. But anyways, so there was a named price, 30 cents per kilowatt hour for these standard offer contracts. So sure enough, that was the market signal that I think folks were looking for. Everybody, all the traditional real estate developers, lot of business owners, a lot of high net worth individuals, sort of came in, saw this opportunity. And that was sort of a jumpstart to the Vermont solar market. So that program went to a lottery and despite submitting five different brownfield and landfill sites into the lottery, we didn’t win one of them. So we were able to work collaboratively with a gentleman who did win one of the auction spots and we helped him co-develop a three and a half megawatt, 2.2 megawatt AC project. And we were kind of off to the races.

Jon Powers:

Right. So now you had a track record.

Chad Farrell:

Yeah, We just sort of… Those were tough years. I mean to be having your head down, just trying to learn as much as you can and find as many opportunities as you can. I think for a couple of years there, we might’ve done a couple of hundred kilowatts per year.

Jon Powers:

Right. I wrote a piece of a while ago and I’ve talked about it before on the show, but about sort of solar finance and the growth of it. Those are the years where people are like one, what do these tariffs mean? What’s a PPA, do these panels even work? And there’s definitely, is there enough sun in Vermont, to even work, right? Versus where we are today, it’s about the size and scale and then I’ll take…

Chad Farrell:

Yeah. I refer to deals back in those days as Frankenstein deals. Right. I feel like you needed a mission driven investor, somebody who’s interested in taking a four or 5% return, less than that, just to do the right thing. You needed a grant, maybe two, you needed zero interest debt from a community development financing organization.

Jon Powers:

Yeah.

Chad Farrell:

You needed all these things and then maybe you could get 150 kilowatt project on. And that would be such news that the governor and all the legislatures will come out for the press event, the ribbon cutting that was, those are tough.

Jon Powers:

So looking now over 10 years, right, and give some color of how Encore has grown in scale. And I want to go back too to the CDFI comment in a second, but just from a developer’s perspective, you’re knocking out a couple of hundred megawatts a year, so how did that change and grow here now there we’re in 2020.

Chad Farrell:

Yeah. Well, for sure I think we did a lot of legislative advocacy work. The standard offer program is still there and it’s still the source of some project opportunities. Really Vermont, led by green mountain power, quite frankly, created a virtual net metering program. And at the time, they viewed solar as having six cents per kilowatt hour more value than the retail rate. So they were willing to pay more for solar at that time. So, really the state kind of followed suit and our virtual net metering program enjoyed a lot of success through 2013, 2014, 2015, into 16. It’s changing. I think that program has, there’ve been additional constraints put on that program. And a lot of those constraints are in our view justified, right? We need to continue to be as competitive as possible. We need to move towards the locational value of generation preferred site citing and things like that. But yeah, it was largely the virtual net metering program that kind of kept us alive.

Jon Powers:

As that scale sort of happened, right, going back to your earlier comments about being an engineer and efficiency, how have you seen sort of the efficiency of just the market as a whole change from having, now all of a sudden probably the mid- 2010s, you’ve got a qualified workforce, right. There’s more than two people that can be the UPC on these now. How has that sort of grown in scale for you guys and both within Encore, but just as a market as a whole?

Chad Farrell:

Yeah, I would say yes. In terms of the skilled labor that we need both on the construction end, as well as the development end, right. The volume of solar engineers and environmental experts who really can kind of speak a renewable energy language at this point, the fact that all the professionals in the legal and accounting communities have really come up the curve, that’s all been tremendously helpful. And I also think about where you sit project financing, right. Again, getting back to that Frankenstein comment. I mean, those were the days when there were just more opportunities out there than there was cash. And now, we’re at a point where I feel like, and again, we’re going to have to see what the effect of COVID-19 is here, but recently there have been in my view, in our view, a lot more money out there than there were good projects.

Chad Farrell:

So for us, our focus has always been as an origination platform. We’ve over the years discussed numerous times, probably too many times to count, should we raise our own fund? And we’ve always come around to no, because I think we excel at originating the best sites and the best projects, and then driving them through the project development process and really minimizing the risk associated with the development process. And then now that we have a wealth of project capital available, again TBD where that ends up this year, but I feel like that’s been one of the greatest evolutions in this industry is just the availability of low cost of capital.

Jon Powers:

And hopefully that continues. I feel like both the capital, but we have, I believe that as the market continues to sort of be unsettled right now, these sort of steady assets, people are going to be coming back, even if it’s five and 6% returns, right. That’s the place you can park your money. It’s better than a 30% hit. And some of these pension funds and others-

Chad Farrell:

100% agreed. Yeah. We’re all obviously trying to look at the pros and cons of what we’re going through here. And that could be something, right. This thing and hard assets have a much greater value than stocks.

Jon Powers:

Can you talk just for a second, I want to come back to CDFI, but how much of your portfolio that you’ve developed has been on brownfields and then for folks that are not familiar, can you just add some color to some of the challenges, but also sort of opportunities, that the brownfield space bring.

Chad Farrell:

Yeah. So I was just looking at this and I yes, we do specialize and focus on brownfields and landfills, parking lots. We’ve done a number of rooftop projects. So all projects within that sort of, I call it a preferred site bucket, represent about 30% of the total number of projects that we’ve done. That’s on a project basis, not a megawatt scale basis. I’d have to do that math. But yeah, because I think I’d be… One thing we did, one of the challenges associated with brownfields and landfills is that in a competitive, lowest per kilowatt hour price wins kind of environment, we’re at a competitive disadvantage because landfills cost, depending on scale of the project, anywhere between 10 and maybe 20% more to build.

Jon Powers:

Right. Because of environmental permits and other key-

Chad Farrell:

It’s more on the hard construction end of things where we’re not able to just drive right out into the field and drive piles and hang panels and pull wires. We’ve got to use low tire pressure or track mounted Kubota rigs. So it’s just really, it slows things down.

Jon Powers:

Right.

Chad Farrell:

And so it’s really the labor cost associated with that, taking a project that would normally take two or three months and kind of doubling that timescale.

Jon Powers:

Are there additional incentives that help bring that down. Can you talk about that for a second?

Chad Farrell:

Yeah absolutely. So we’ve worked really hard in Vermont to try to advocate for… I mean because the benefits of the brownfields and landfills is you are citing generation, generally much closer to load, you are utilizing an otherwise undevelopable, or very difficult to develop, site. These sites are generally not in residential high view, aesthetically high quality areas. And yeah. And I think the general public is of the mind look, yeah. If we’re going to do solar projects, which take significant amounts of land, let’s use the land that is not prime ag or otherwise have a higher and better use for housing or other commercial real estate. So-

Jon Powers:

Up here in Buffalo, we’re seeing a lot of brownfield development for solar, we have a huge former industrial base. And I actually on the board of a group called Buffalo Waterkeeper, which is, do a lot of ecosystem work here. But they’re now getting pulled into the solar discussion because all these local communities that they’ve done water ecosystem works for are now being approached by major developers. And they’re like, “What do we do? What’s the decision point on our ag”. We may be underwater to begin with right now, or do we give up this prime location versus there’s brownfield space.

Chad Farrell:

Well yeah, absolutely. And one of the other benefits that we’re seeing actually comes from the regulatory community. We’ve seen actually members of the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation actually approach us and ask if we can engage with a landfill owner, maybe it’s a private landfill owner, could be municipal, and they’re viewing the lease payments that we can provide that landowner as financial security for being able to continue the environmental remediation or monitoring or whatever the annual environmental costs are. They’re viewing us as being able to essentially securitize those future payments so that the regulators can continue to do their jobs, which is make sure they’re protecting human health and the environment.

Jon Powers:

Right. So is the reason you guys were working with CDFI… First of all, can you explain what that is for folks that aren’t familiar, but is that because of the brownfield work or were you doing that just in general before?

Chad Farrell:

Yeah, so I think we did… Yes. So we’ve secured financing from a few CDFIs, Community Development Financing Institutions. The first slug of capital that we received was from the Vermont Economic Development Authority, or VEDA, who have a statutorily defined mission to support entrepreneurial activities, especially in certain industries like energy and food and tourism. And then, so we saw that as a good sort of source of capital and in doing so it’s a lower cost of capital, right. But it also aligned us with an organization that’s now helping us to succeed. We’ve also secured funding from the Vermont Flexible Capital Fund, who’ve been tremendous as investor partners. It’s again, it’s a mission driven-

Jon Powers:

Is it almost like a private partnership there or is that all state money or?

Chad Farrell:

No, that is… Well, there is some state money, there’s the Vermont Community Foundation, it supports them. But there are some individuals who are mission driven impact investors who are interested, again, in the Vermont Flexible Capital Fund, they’re targeting renewable energy companies, food and beverage companies, working landscape companies. So kind of in tune with Vermont’s kind of ethos. But the most recent round of funding that we got from them, they brought in the New Hampshire Community Loan Fund and Coastal Enterprises out of Portland, Maine. And was of interest to us because while we were raising that capital to begin to deploy our go to market strategies in those two markets that are not our home market. So-

Jon Powers:

This is all sort of pre NTP development capital you’re using, right?

Chad Farrell:

Working capital, yeah. Growth capital, absolutely.

Jon Powers:

That’s awesome.

Chad Farrell:

Yeah, so again, now that we have… in New Hampshire, the New Hampshire market’s been a little slower to develop as you’re probably aware, but-

Jon Powers:

We’ve done nothing there yet.

Chad Farrell:

Yeah. We’ve done one project there. So, but we have them kind of as a resource to help us understand and make connections, boots on the ground, and really help us succeed in that new market. And Coastal Enterprises in Portland, another good example, through them we’ve met a lot of the players over there. They now have a vested interest in our success in that market. We’ve been a source of a lot of intelligence and contact information.

Jon Powers:

So I want to talk about the future of Encore in a second, but just in your sort of corporate structure, right. I mean, you’ve got, you’re talking about a lot of different buckets that you’re touching, right, to pull this capital from, which is great and creative. Who manages that within your team? So are you doing it or do you have someone specifically doing that type of management?

Chad Farrell:

Yeah. All of that work falls under the purview of our CFO, COO Blake Sturcke.

Jon Powers:

Right, okay Blake gotcha.

Chad Farrell:

Blake comes to Encore with a 15 year track record at Morgan Stanley as an investment banker. Really highly fluent in all things finance. And so, our finance-

Jon Powers:

Full transparency, Blake’s one of my favorite people in the industry, that’s how I met you guys.

Chad Farrell:

Awesome. Glad to hear that he actually is a Bucknell grad as well.

Jon Powers:

Oh he is?

Chad Farrell:

So we go all the way back. Yeah.

Jon Powers:

What is it? The Bisons, right?

Chad Farrell:

Yeah. He was a year below me at Bucknell. Lots of mutual friends and obviously we’ve become a lot closer in adulthood here. But-

Jon Powers:

So what is the 2020s going to look like for you guys?

Chad Farrell:

Sorry, 2020-

Jon Powers:

What do the 2020s look like moving forward? You’re a decade in, what’s the next decade look like?

Chad Farrell:

Yeah. So I mean, obviously again, we’re kind of waiting to see what the next two, three, four, five months look like. But taking that variable out, we are interested in growing the team. I think we’ve established a fair-

Jon Powers:

How many other team now?

Chad Farrell:

There’s 12 of us.

Jon Powers:

Oh, great.

Chad Farrell:

12 of us on the team with, right now one intern, sometimes we’ll have two or three. Right now one. Yeah, I think it’s growth, right? It’s how do we capitalize on the work that we’ve done in the past? The reputation that we’ve earned. All of our projects are referenceable. How do we, again, systematize the platform so that more people can come in and essentially do more work. It’s the same stuff, it’s the same process, there’s just going to be more of us doing it. So I think we’re interested in establishing a presence in some of these other markets, at-

Jon Powers:

Some organic growth, moving to New Hampshire, Maine, geographically to start to… You’re not jumping to Seattle?

Chad Farrell:

No, we’re going to be focused on the Northeast. That’ll include Pennsylvania, maybe some other states south of us. There may be a couple of flyers that we’ll take. For example, we’re looking at a 12 megawatt portfolio in Western North Carolina, somewhat randomly, but there’s… Our chief development officer is from that area and has some connections there and so we’ve been able to feeling decent about that opportunity. So, but largely it’s the Northeast focus. We’re going to absolutely… Storage is a big part of our future plans. We’re of the mind that if you’re just a solar development company, in five years I think you’re out of business. I think you’ve got to really, and especially in advanced markets like Vermont, we can’t do much more solar until we unlock the potential that is energy storage. I’m talking both short term, lithium ion kind of stuff, and longer term where we’re involved in a large, long duration project that we’re pitching here in Vermont with a group called Highview Power, based in London, who have a liquified air storage technology. Again, long duration, 50 megawatts, so big projects.

Chad Farrell:

So we’re not just going to be a solar developer. We’re going to be solar and storage energy services provider. We will be looking to raise additional capital, again TBD as to when that was going to be occurring.

Jon Powers:

Oh, you got my emails.

Chad Farrell:

I think, yeah. I think we would have been looking at that later this year. We may have to push that back a little bit, but.

Jon Powers:

Before we wrap up, I do want to hit on one thing, which is, we’ve talked about this in the podcast in the past. Pollinators, we talked before about sort of the drive in Vermont to ensure that there’s pollinators on these sites. Just talk for a second about why you guys see this as a benefit and how it’s working for you.

Chad Farrell:

So I think this comes back to our status or our mission, basically, and our vision. Which is to use business as a force for good. And we try to think about the impact of our work from more of just a financial perspective. As B Corp, we’re always thinking about the triple bottom line. So, what kind of social benefit are our projects providing, or our work, and what kind of environmental benefits? I think the environmental benefits are a little easier to quantify, but with the example of pollinators, I mean it’s a big need, right? I mean, our food security kind of depends on getting this turned around and getting these pollinators back to a more healthy status. It’s interesting.

Chad Farrell:

We’ve done pollinators on a number of our projects here in Vermont and I’ve got a good anecdote for you. One of the projects in Hinesburg, Vermont, we had some neighbors there that were less than thrilled that we were using this site for a 2.1 megawatt solar array. We worked them through it, we built a berm, we visually screened it, we got them there. And we let them know we’re going to be planting pollinators. Well, two years, maybe it’s three years now, we heard from others in the town that their gardens are now just flourishing, the apple tree that hadn’t delivered apples in years was now just, they were falling off the tree. Their gardens, their vegetables, everything, so much better because they’ve got this thriving pollinator population right next door.

Jon Powers:

Yeah, Rob Davis from Fresh Energy told me about a story about in Minnesota, that farmers are actually rotating their crops around some of these places. Because it just makes sense.

Chad Farrell:

It’s awesome, yeah.

Jon Powers:

So I always end the podcast with a final question. If you went back to yourself, coming out of Bucknell and could sit down and have a beer with yourself, what piece of advice would you give?

Chad Farrell:

Yeah, that’s a great way to close. I think I would have told myself to chill out a little bit, I don’t know.

Jon Powers:

It’s good advice.

Chad Farrell:

Seriously, I look back and what I did in my early twenties, yeah it ended up being, I think, applicable to the rest of my career. But there are so many instances where that’s not the case and I think it’s so important, and I’m going to impart this with my kids, is you really got to love what you’re doing. You really got to be emotionally and intellectually invested in what you’re doing. You got to have a passion for it. So maybe you got to take 20 years, 22 through 25, or whatever that number is because I mean, let’s face it. Not many people make their career between 22 and 25. Some people do, but-

Jon Powers:

Mark Zuckerberg, other than that.

Chad Farrell:

Yeah. Find something that you really love. And if you’ve got to… Hopefully they can afford to be able to do that. There’s obviously financial implications there, but to really just develop a passion, follow that passion, and watch yourself just thrive.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. I love it. Well, good. Chad, thank you so much for joining us.

Chad Farrell:

Awesome, Jon. This has been a lot of fun. I really appreciate the opportunity to be on your show.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. I want to thank specifically Lauren Glickman for helping us set this up. She actually helped me start the podcast years ago. And Carly Battin, our producer. For those who are joining us, please go to cleancapital.com to get more episodes. And as always send me folks that you think would be good guests and I hope you’ll continue listening.

Jon Powers:

Thanks for listening in today’s conversation. Find more episodes on cleancapital.com, iTunes, or wherever you get your podcasts. If you like what you hear, be sure to subscribe and leave us a five star review. We look forward to continuing our conversation on energy, innovation, and finance with you.
[/av_textblock]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwh5253′ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_social_share title=’Share this entry’ style=” buttons=” share_facebook=” share_twitter=” share_pinterest=” share_gplus=” share_reddit=” share_linkedin=” share_tumblr=” share_vk=” share_mail=” av-desktop-hide=” av-medium-hide=” av-small-hide=” av-mini-hide=” av_uid=’av-354olk’]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_button label=’More Podcasts’ link=’page,5266′ link_target=” size=’small’ position=’center’ label_display=” icon_select=’no’ icon=’ue800′ font=’entypo-fontello’ color=’theme-color’ custom_bg=’#444444′ custom_font=’#ffffff’ av_uid=’av-jx1x7jx3′ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

Episode 70: John Chaimanis

[av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/podcast-image-pageheader2.jpg’ attachment=’4329′ attachment_size=’full’ copyright=” caption=” styling=” align=’center’ font_size=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ animation=’no-animation’ hover=” appearance=” link=” target=” title_attr=” alt_attr=” id=” custom_class=” av_element_hidden_in_editor=’0′ av_uid=’av-jwwgyb48′ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’20’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgxszg’ admin_preview_bg=”]

Episode 70: John Chaimanis

[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’10’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwl4lsb2′ admin_preview_bg=”]
This week’s guest is John Chaimanis, co-founder and managing director of Kendall Sustainable Infrastructure. At Kendall, John works on all aspects of business, including deal sourcing, financial structuring, and asset management. Prior to Kendall, Mr. Chaimanis worked for Edison International, where he developed over $500M of energy projects, installing 250MW of renewable assets. 

Host Jon Powers digs into John’s past and present experiences in the finance and renewable sectors as well as where the industry has been, and where it is headed in the next few years. 
[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” font_color=” color=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwh5253′ admin_preview_bg=”]

Listen now:

[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’20’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-k4so2umi’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ExpertsOnly-bar-Chaimanis2.jpg’ attachment=’7623′ attachment_size=’full’ copyright=” caption=” styling=” align=’center’ font_size=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ animation=’no-animation’ hover=” appearance=” link=’manually,https://link.chtbl.com/CVzoJUKN’ target=’_blank’ title_attr=” alt_attr=” id=” custom_class=” av_element_hidden_in_editor=’0′ av_uid=’av-k37p0z0j’ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwh5253′ admin_preview_bg=”]

Full transcript:

Jon Powers:

Welcome to Experts Only podcast, sponsored by Clean Capital, learn more CleanCapital.com. I’m your host, Jon Powers. Each week, we explore the intersection of energy, innovation, and finance with leaders across the industry. Thank you so much for joining us.

Jon Powers:

Welcome back to Experts Only, this is your host, Jon Powers, We have a really interesting conversation today with John Chaimanis. John is a co founder of Kendall Sustainable Infrastructure and has a deep background working, developing hundreds of millions of dollars of wind projects at Edison, and then launching Kendall and really focusing on the commercial industrial space for solar. We talk about where the industry has been and where it’s going. And we’re also doing this interview in the middle of current pandemic. So getting a sense of how we should be looking at the market right now and what adjustments we might be dealing with. So I hope you enjoy the conversation.

Jon Powers:

John, thanks so much for joining me on Experts Only.

John Chaimanis:

Thank you, Jon pleasure to be here.

Jon Powers:

So you’ve got a really great and diverse background. You went to school at Villanova, grew up in New York. What first got you interested in clean energy?

John Chaimanis:

I guess it started as a kid in the Boy Scouts, a childhood passion for the environment.

Jon Powers:

Oh yeah, were you an Eagle Scout?

John Chaimanis:

I am an Eagle Scout.

Jon Powers:

I am too.

John Chaimanis:

Oh, right on.

Jon Powers:

Yeah, that’s funny.

John Chaimanis:

but it probably was in 2005 when I went to business school at Babson that I was changing careers from running a charter school to what was next, and renewable energy just formed this perfect nexus of being able to do some meaningful impact as well as work in a profitable industry.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. So let’s go step back though. So at Villanova, did you study education?

John Chaimanis:

No, I studied finance.

Jon Powers:

Finance, and then, talk a little bit about the decision to go into running a charter school. That’s an interesting jump.

John Chaimanis:

I found that a lot of my classes, a lot of my classmates were focused on Wall Street, in the finance division at Villanova. And I wasn’t quite interested in doing that. So, I picked up some volunteer activities while I was at Villanova, Habitat for Humanity, some retreats, different sort of activities like that. And I felt that I’d been given a lot in my life, I’ve been blessed with a good education, and I thought that the most important thing I can do to help society was to give back through education. So I did a year long volunteer experience, sort of a Teach for America. And then I got involved in a charter school with a couple of other folks.

Jon Powers:

And where was that?

John Chaimanis:

A guy that really … It was here in Massachusetts area, in the Boston area. So most of our students were from Dorchester and the school ended up actually being in South Boston.

Jon Powers:

Oh, interesting. Interesting. And was there a focus to charter or was it just sort of classic education?

John Chaimanis:

Yeah. Yeah. The founder of the school, who is really the … Wrote the pedagogy, wrote the charter application itself, so I was really fascinated with rhetoric in the classical Greek sense of rhetoric. So being able to advocate for yourself and to make changes for yourself through public speech.

Jon Powers:

Oh, fascinating. Yeah.

John Chaimanis:

So it was sort of focused on that, but it was a lot on the humanities. It was a rounded education with maybe a little bit more of a bent on humanities and arts.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. Yeah. Fascinating. So along the way you decided, okay, I’m going to head back to business school and head in a new direction. Was energy part of that or was that when you got the business school, that’s when you started to really realize the opportunity there? And what timeframe is this, by the way, the business school?

John Chaimanis:

Yeah, so business school was 2005. So I’d been running the charter school for probably four years, so I ran all the business and operations side of it. So I’ve always been sort of an operations finance type person. And I was lending it to the education space. When I went to business school, I pretty much decided that immediately I had to have a plan and I sort of identified, I thought I could change one of two things about myself. I could change my industry or I could change my function. I decided to keep my function, which was business finance and I changed the industry. And renewables, so I was reading National Geographic, I had a subscription at the time and I got the Peak Oil edition, and the Peak Oil edition, it talked all about what happens with peak oil and what does all that mean and then what are our other energy options? And inside there was a … They fold out the picture in the middle of the magazine, and it was a wind turbine blade. And there were like 70 people standing shoulder to shoulder. I was blown away, I said, “This can’t be real. This is science fiction.” And it wasn’t, and I said, “This is it.”

Jon Powers:

That’s awesome.

John Chaimanis:

So that’s pretty much how I got into renewables.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. So post Babson, is that when you went to Edison

John Chaimanis:

Post Babson joined Edison Mission Energy out in Southern California.

Jon Powers:

If I remember correctly, when you were Babson, you started an annual energy conference, you were starting to get sort of really involved in this space?

John Chaimanis:

Absolutely. Yeah, I did. It’s still running. I think it’s in its 15th year, or they had to postpone it because of what we’re going through right now with COVID-19.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. The audience, I forgot to mention at the beginning, we’re actually recording this in the middle of the crisis, when most of us obviously are at home right now. So yeah, it’s interesting, I think the whole world is sort of on pause right now.

John Chaimanis:

Yeah. Yeah.

Jon Powers:

Did you actually move out to California? Or did you stay in Massachusetts with Edison?

John Chaimanis:

Yeah. I moved out to California, lived in a sunny Southern California, had a great time, learned a lot, got to do some really fantastic things, explored a lot of the country. And then at the end of 2011, 2012, moved back to the East coast, back to the Boston area.

Jon Powers:

Right. And when you were at Edison, you’re mostly focused on sort of utility scale wind, right?

John Chaimanis:

That was the bread. Yeah, that was the core of what I was working on. I was really in the wind energy development group there, but-

Jon Powers:

Were you doing finance specific stuff or were you doing core development?

John Chaimanis:

I was doing more development. Development, M and A, we had a lot of JVs, a lot of joint ventures with other regional developers. So I was involved in kind of managing those and bringing projects across the finish line. But the neat thing was being inside of the independent power producer, which had a natural gas business, which was the legacy coal business, which had a power trading business and an FTR proprietary balk and all these other aspects and the company was great. They really allowed me to kibitz on different areas and learn a lot.

Jon Powers:

Interesting. So when you moved back to the East coast, was it with the vision of launching Kendall? What triggered the move and was it because you wanted to move out of that sort of larger infrastructure? What was sort of the next step for you?

John Chaimanis:

Yeah, again, speaking of economic crisis where we are today in 2020, it was 2009 to 2012, 2013 was the economic crisis caused by the mortgages, which is a very different economic backdrop. But living through that and experiencing that really sort of gave me … I started picking up a little pieces of information about how the industry worked, where opportunities lie, what areas weren’t being capitalized on. And I just wasn’t in the mindset of joining another independent power producer at that point in time, I was really interested in taking a lot of the great things that I learned, putting on a couple of new ideas and then going to market. So that’s sort of where the spark came from. Although I’d say a lot of it was time and place. That’s also when I met my partner, Ken Lehman, who had been working in private equity and that’s when we put together our strategy.

Jon Powers:

So talking for a second, first of all, where does the name Kendall come from?

John Chaimanis:

When Ken first started working, the office was in Kendall Square.

Jon Powers:

No kidding. That’s funny.

John Chaimanis:

Yeah. We stuck with it.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. So, you guys met, what was the … It’s an impetus to say, okay, let’s dive in here and make this Kendall Sustainable Infrastructure. Was it a multi-year dating cycle or was it something that you sort of met over coffee and jumped right in?

John Chaimanis:

Yeah, no. I was looking at a couple of different things when we were starting it. I was involved with a retail energy business that was doing maybe the wholesale, we call when the wholesale and the backdrop, these are the asset management associated with retail energy businesses, and I had a couple of other ideas as well that I was slowly fortunate enough to have some time to work through, but where it really came together was a lot of it was my background, my focus, my desire to be in the development side, to be in the asset ownership side. And we were able to raise some capital for our first fund, our initial capital for our first fund. And that really kicked it off, but like anything, it took longer.

Jon Powers:

Sure.

John Chaimanis:

Slower than everything.

Jon Powers:

If there’s any piece of advice I got when we were starting CleanCapital is from one of my best friends who had started a company in Cleveland was like, whatever you think, it’s going to take longer than that for sure. So just be in a mindset it’s going to take longer.

John Chaimanis:

Yeah.

Jon Powers:

Just for folks that aren’t aware. Can you explain what Kendall does and what your mission is?

John Chaimanis:

Yeah. So Kendall Sustainable Infrastructure, we are a fund based investor with a focus on improving the world through capital investments. We’re focused on ownership of real assets that create a meaningful need or service. So renewable energy being the biggest and the core today, and water is something that we’re actively working upon right now. We believe that the work that we’re doing is impactful, is meaningful. And we’re very focused on both outstanding returns for our limited partners, as well as making good transactions for our development partners, the people that we buy our projects from. We think that our capital is creating jobs, that it is high paying jobs, good paying jobs, in generally less urban areas and meaningfully moving the economy ahead.

Jon Powers:

That’s Great. So, from a track record, you guys have built over 50 projects, over 30 megawatts, in multiple States. Before diving into the nuts and bolts of Kendall, talk to me about raising that first fund and was it, did you guys have a circle target? Was it your LP’s family office? Who were you guys raising from?

John Chaimanis:

Yeah. Yeah. So …

Jon Powers:

And this is like 2012-ish?

John Chaimanis:

2012, 2013, right. The first capital came from a family office, I’d call them an institutional grade family office. So professionals are managing the money as opposed to just the individual or the head of the family.

Jon Powers:

Based in Boston or where were they?

John Chaimanis:

Maybe they have some ties to Boston, but based in the, let’s say generally Northeast.

Jon Powers:

Got you. All right.

John Chaimanis:

They were a huge supporter of ours. From there we were able to bring in a few other sort of smaller family offices in the first fund, as well as a multifamily office, sort of an RIA, but more of a multifamily office. And they came in with sort of a number of families into the fund.

Jon Powers:

Right.

John Chaimanis:

And that was really what fund one was comprised of.

Jon Powers:

Interesting. And then how many funds have you guys done in total?

John Chaimanis:

So we’re on our second fund right now. We’ve closed our second fund little over a year ago, at the end of 2019.

Jon Powers:

That’s great. And you guys have put, if I read right, you guys have about 150 million under management?

John Chaimanis:

Yeah. Right. About 150 million is about what we’ve described the asset value of our portfolio.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. And paint a picture for the audience of what your classic asset looks like.

John Chaimanis:

Classic asset of what we’ve invested in so far as a distributed generation solar project, called 500 kilowatts to five megawatts, off takers look like municipalities, universities, schools, hospitals, some CNI, some community solar. Generally, they’ve got these longterm contracts. We tend to build with tier one equipment. And I think what differentiates us or where we participate in a unique way is we really do participate in late stages of development on through really the ownership space. So we’ve kind of carved out a niche of being expert developers ourselves and helping development groups that are looking to really sell projects at the MTP stage, but we get involved much sooner than that.

Jon Powers:

Right. So are you seeing that space shift now as the market has continued to mature and maybe more money is looking, it used to be the institutional money wouldn’t come pre CCOD or pre MTP at all, but now more and more folks are looking there for returns. Are you seeing that shaking up your business model or do you guys feel like you’ve got a pretty good pool of developers that you work with that you can just rinse and repeat with?

John Chaimanis:

These are cycles. I would call them cycles. Money comes down and money pulls back. Right?

Jon Powers:

Right.

John Chaimanis:

And what are the factors that bring money down and pull it back? Competition causes money to move deeper into the value chain. When uncertainty comes or risks come, it generally pulls back pretty quickly.

Jon Powers:

Yeah.

John Chaimanis:

And I saw it in wind energy. I’ve heard it described about in the gas industry, and in solar, some more of the institutional has theoretically come down into the distributed generation space. And we’ve seen some competition in that. But I do think a lot of that is going to pull back here with what’s gone on with the economic crisis. There’s there’s capital, but the risk premium for money has gone way up.

Jon Powers:

Right, yeah absolutely. I see the next three to six months bring as folks are, one, reeling from some of their public investment losses, from these bigger funds, and figuring out … We’re making the argument that the asset class that we’re in with you guys here is that it’s a great place to park your money, because it may not get you the 15, 20% returns that you were hoping to get in some markets, but it’s a safe place to put your money.

John Chaimanis:

It’s an incredible place to put your money. It’s just the risk adjusted returns are phenomenal in this sector. And I would expect institutional money to continue to appreciate that, to continue to buy, to be buyers of longterm assets, to continue to be MTP buyers or buyers of operating fleets. It’s just a fantastic asset class that there are many utilities, back when utilities meant something with dividends.

Jon Powers:

Right. We were talking before the interview a little bit about the current crisis we’re facing, both of the coronavirus, but then of course the markets and we’ve been advocating at Clean Capitol for a revisit of the 1603 cash grant program or direct cash, as the solar energy industry association is referring it to, partially because of the anxiety around tax equity beginning to dry up. Not because there’s not people interested in it, but just because a lot of companies are not going to be making profits to be paying taxes on. So how are you guys looking at the next the market in the next six months as you’re thinking through some of the deals in your pipeline?

John Chaimanis:

Sure. Well, we’re also big advocates of the cash grant harken back to 1603. Absolutely. I think that’d be a fantastic thing for the industry. I think tax equity, like all capital markets, is pumping the brakes. I do think there are going to be profits. There are corporate profits out there. There are treasury departments, there are banks that have all held stock portfolios that have all got these gains that have even though things slid, they locked in gains on the way down. There’s a reason the stock market fell, it’s because people were taking money off the table and locking in gains. It was up 70% over five, seven years. There are gains there, there will be taxes that people will pay, but I think it’s the risk associated with it right now that is sort of holding capital markets at bay.

John Chaimanis:

I think this is a very different slowdown in the economy than what we saw previously. It’s coming from different places. In 2008, there were toxic assets on the balance sheets, and banks didn’t act because they really didn’t know if they were going to run out of cash if what they thought were assets were actually huge liabilities, or we’re not worth anything. In this instance, the banks, the capital markets, they have the money. It’s not that they don’t have the money, and the interest rates are quite low, but the risk associated with putting it to work as high. The uncertainty of what tomorrow brings is very high. So I think when things start to stabilize that those markets are going to bounce back. I’m one of the believers that those capital markets are going to bounce back pretty fast. Once we see sort of a glimmer of hope, once we start to see, we pass a peak and we sort of come down the other side, I think there’ll be some movement.

Jon Powers:

to just sort of look out here, you’ve now been in the industry for basically a decade or more, actually more if you count your time at Edison. And now looking out in the … I sort of argue that the 2010 to 2020 was sort of the evolution of the industry. It was really ignescent and hit a hockey stick, growth has been amazing and phenomenal. The demand now for renewables is no longer an environmental drive. It’s corporate America. It’s certain States have 40% of Americans live in States that have a hundred percent RPS’s right now at some point in the near future. What does the next decade bring for us both as an industry and then of course the way you guys look at the world as sustainable investors?

John Chaimanis:

Sure. Yeah. Going back to ’05, which is when I was starting my look at the space, it was happening in Europe and it wasn’t really here in the States yet. I think wind was 2 or 3% penetrated and now wind is over 10 or 11, 12.

Jon Powers:

Right.

John Chaimanis:

I think actually it was a dominant, it was a highest renewable generation this past year, more than the hydro. Solar is still at 1, 2% maybe. So you look at the growth, I think the growth for solar is tremendous. Solar has been this really interesting thing because it’s much more visual. Everybody has seen solar, whether you live in a city or a suburb. Wind really was just in the farm country, and when it got close to cities, it wasn’t as visual. And it was really stigmatized. There was a lot of political bantering back and forth.

John Chaimanis:

Solar has been a pretty neat driver, because anybody could put solar on their roof, which makes the adoption of it so much simpler. We still have a huge way to go. I’m a tremendous believer in the electrification of the grid. I think that is happening. A town by us, a town called Brookline, which is right south side of Boston, you cannot put natural gas to new construction homes anymore. If you build a new construction home, you can’t bring natural gas to it. So your cooking, your heating, your cooling, everything has gone electric. And I think that trend is really just going to exacerbate. It’s just going to continue to grow as more and more towns understand that natural gas, well, some people think of it as a bridge fuel. The methane releases are really 17 or 20 times worse than carbon dioxide, they’re tremendously worse, or maybe it’s 74 times, forgive my-

Jon Powers:

Significantly.

John Chaimanis:

Significantly worse than carbon dioxide. So we’re going to see that we’re going to see the cars all coming to the, electric cars are all coming. Every major manufacturer at this year’s auto show all had electric vehicles. So I think those things continue to be drivers. And then renewables, just filling in. And where we’re at with batteries, they’re not, in and of themselves, batteries are fantastic. I love them. But in and of themselves as a generation source, they’re not quite economic, if you will, so to speak, put that economic in quotes. But when you start to locate those with renewables, you’ve got an incredible resource.

Jon Powers:

Right. So I always like to wrap up my interview with a pretty standard question for folks, and it’s, as you noticed, we spent a lot of time on your background. I think people are really interested in how leaders develop in the industry, how you get into the space. So if you could go back and sit down with a young John coming out of Villanova and grab a beer, what pieces of advice would you give yourself?

John Chaimanis:

I think what I would say is the most important thing is to find your passion, find what you believe in, identify what your strength is, what your hard strength is. Is it finances? Is it accounting? Is it marketing? Is it law? Develop your functional strength and apply it to your passion.

Jon Powers:

Right. That’s great. That’s great advice. Well, John, thank you so much for joining us today at Experts Only.

John Chaimanis:

Hey Jon, it was a pleasure. Thank you.

Jon Powers:

And we want to thank the team at Kendall for helping put this together and sending over some great information. Of course, our producer, Carly Battin, as always for her hard work, you can always get more episodes of CleanCapital.com and as always I hope you please send us folks that you think we should be talking to. And I look forward to continuing the conversation. Thanks.

Jon Powers:

Thanks for listening in today’s conversation. Find more episodes on CleanCapital.com, iTunes or wherever you get your podcasts. If you like what you hear, be sure to subscribe and leave us a five star review. We look forward to continuing our conversation on energy, innovation and finance with you.
[/av_textblock]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwh5253′ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_social_share title=’Share this entry’ style=” buttons=” share_facebook=” share_twitter=” share_pinterest=” share_gplus=” share_reddit=” share_linkedin=” share_tumblr=” share_vk=” share_mail=” av-desktop-hide=” av-medium-hide=” av-small-hide=” av-mini-hide=” av_uid=’av-354olk’]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_button label=’More Podcasts’ link=’page,5266′ link_target=” size=’small’ position=’center’ label_display=” icon_select=’no’ icon=’ue800′ font=’entypo-fontello’ color=’theme-color’ custom_bg=’#444444′ custom_font=’#ffffff’ av_uid=’av-jx1x7jx3′ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

Episode 67: Chris Archer

[av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/podcast-image-pageheader2.jpg’ attachment=’4329′ attachment_size=’full’ align=’center’ styling=” hover=” link=” target=” caption=” font_size=” appearance=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ copyright=” animation=’no-animation’ id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgyb48′ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’20’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgxszg’ admin_preview_bg=”]

Episode 67: Chris Archer

[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’10’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwl4lsb2′ admin_preview_bg=”]
Today’s guest is Chris Archer, Senior Managing Director and Head of Americas at Macquarie’s Green Investment Group. Under Chris’ leadership the Green Investment Group has commercialized over 1 gigawatt of renewable energy projects in North America, playing a key role as an investor, advisor and project manager and furthering our transition to a clean energy economy. Host Jon Powers digs into Chris’s deep experience in infrastructure & renewable energy investing and explores his thoughts on the opportunities for the continued growth of clean energy as well some of the complex challenges that remain barriers for investors in the sector.
[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” font_color=” color=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwh5253′ admin_preview_bg=”]

Listen now:

[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’20’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-k4so2umi’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_image src=’https://cleancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ExpertsOnly-bar-Archer.jpg’ attachment=’7549′ attachment_size=’full’ copyright=” caption=” styling=” align=’center’ font_size=” overlay_opacity=’0.4′ overlay_color=’#000000′ overlay_text_color=’#ffffff’ animation=’no-animation’ hover=” appearance=” link=’manually,https://link.chtbl.com/9aoz1fbx’ target=’_blank’ title_attr=” alt_attr=” id=” custom_class=” av_element_hidden_in_editor=’0′ av_uid=’av-k37p0z0j’ admin_preview_bg=”][/av_image]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwh5253′ admin_preview_bg=”]

Full transcript:

[/av_textblock]

[av_textblock size=” av-medium-font-size=” av-small-font-size=” av-mini-font-size=” font_color=” color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwh5253′ admin_preview_bg=”]
Jon Powers:

Chris thanks so much for joining us at Experts Only.

Chris Archer:

Thanks very much for having me Jon.

Jon Powers:

You’ve got a really amazing background and I’m going to dive into the professional side in a bit. But you were just talking about flying, you grew up in a military family and moved around a little bit. But you ended up in your university years in London. What in that experience really triggered you to get interested in finance and then later in the environment?

Chris Archer:

So I started off doing a civil engineering degree. I actually applied to do a mechanical engineering degree and then spent a year with the British Army Royal Engineers, which was more civil engineering kind of like, well at least military civil engineering, so building bridges and things like that. So switched to a civil engineering degree. And I guess the thing that motivated me to want to be in civil engineering was the idea of being behind, making big projects happen.

Chris Archer:

So for me that was one consideration. And I guess the other consideration was I had a really fantastic economics professor when I was at university. He was a transport economist and he used economics to solve real world problems and particularly real world problems around the provision of infrastructure. So whether it’s roads or whether it’s railways and houses, used kind of economic modeling to create signals for new investment in those pieces of infrastructure to reduce congestion or to make public railways more efficient.

Chris Archer:

So that got me quite interested in how all that works and actually I was more interested in the theoretical models of economics then in the theoretical models of how to stop a bridge from falling down.

Jon Powers:

Right.

Chris Archer:

So I started looking for a job that could combine kind of my two interests, one which was economics and finance and kind of how you pay for things and how you measure demand and pricing. And the other thing, which was making big projects happen.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. And was Macquarie the first place you went post university?

Chris Archer:

Yeah, pretty much. I did a little bit of consulting and a little working for a consultancy that my economics professor ran. But pretty much I joined Macquarie as a graduate, but kind of a year after graduating.

Jon Powers:

And then when did you transition from, you transitioned to the US to sort of lead the green energy for America’s practice. But that’s after having spent a significant amount of time working on these issues in London, right?

Chris Archer:

I guess we were in a team who’s purpose was to find big projects to invest in and sort of pull together the delivery of those projects and guess the equity and then ultimately sell that equity to infrastructure funds or pension funds. And so we were always hunting for the next projects. It was actually, especially in Europe where projects actually had quite, infrastructure projects were procured by governments and real projects had a lot of similarities, the revenue streams were relatively contracted or vested in government banks renewable energy certificates.

Chris Archer:

It was actually for me easier to find renewable energy projects at some point then to bid for these complex government infrastructure projects, which took many years to come to fruition. A renewables project, you could just go chat to a developer and then come to an agreement to provide financing to that project. And it was a much quicker and a lot more opportunity. And I guess that would’ve been sort of 2012 time when we really started looking at that. And we also looked at, across the team I started to look at solar, there was someone else who was looking at the transmission rights for offshore wind. And then we started looking at the off shore wind assets themselves.

Chris Archer:

Energy, which had been procured by government through PDP structures and buying those projects were also a feature. So between sort of 2012 and 2014, 2015, the Macquarie team, that team was just doing infrastructure, really started to branch out doing a lot of renewable energy projects in a lot of different sectors. And the team really grew from that point. And by sort of 2015, it was almost like an independent renewable energy investment business, sort of sitting alongside the infrastructure business.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. Interesting.

Chris Archer:

And then ultimately I guess in 2017 we acquired the UK government’s Green Investment Bank, which had been set up around 2012 to address the need for capital in particularly sort of under served sectors of the renewable energy space, especially off shore wind and waste, waste treatment solutions. And some sort of C&I projects, where there was perceived to be a shortage of private capital in the market at that time. But by 2017, the government had decided there was enough private capital available and it made sense for them to actually monetize the Green Investment Bank and all of its investments. And Macquarie won that bid. It was Macquarie consorting with some pension funds and our infrastructure funds. We won that bid and I was involved in integrating that business into Macquarie. Sort of became the deputy head of the business in Europe.

Chris Archer:

And then in 2018 moved over to the US to sort of launch that brand over here. Which we’re calling the Green Investment Group and we’ve launched that brand now around the world.

Jon Powers:

You guys are doing amazing, I mean Macquarie’s really become a premier investor in this space. But before talking a little more about Macquarie, you’ve been in this space for well over a decade and have seen it mature over the last ten years. Later on I’m going to talk about what the next ten years look like, but in your experience what are some of the really important lessons you’ve seen as this market really emerged from, at best an alternative technology to now a mainstream energy source?

Chris Archer:

It’s definitely been a really interesting time. And I think if we’d sat here talking about what the decade ahead looked like in 2010, I think we probably would’ve been wrong, just we wouldn’t have been as bold or as optimistic about what the future held for renewables and the rate at which technology’s can change. And I think the lessons I’ve learned have been that the role of government is super important, especially in having a clear plan, a clear idea of where support is needed for different technologies, because you know, a lot of the things that are now really major features of the renewable energy landscape, whether it’s offshore, wind, I think is a particular example, especially in Europe or even just the fact that solar is so cheap now, none of that would really have been possible without governments and especially governments in Europe, but elsewhere as well providing some targeted subsidy of those sectors and that really helps them get off the ground. But what I think I’ve also seen is that when you, once you start doing that, markets react quite quickly, supply chains react quite quickly. And I think everyone’s been surprised at the rate at which costs of technologies fall. And so the other thing that’s super important as well as starting the subsidy, it’s removing the subsidy and allowing market forces to really drive investment. Because if you get it right, you get to this point where you’re taking away subsidy yet the rate of build outs accelerating because you actually don’t need to wait for government policy. The market can go and do projects without worrying about when the policy is going to be there or going to not be there.

Jon Powers:

Yeah. You eliminate a lot of the uncertainties, right. That,

Chris Archer:

Yeah so policy’s great and subsidy’s is great to get things going, but also having a very clear way in which that subsidy these steps back is also really important to enable the market, to sort of, get off the ground itself. And obviously you can get that wrong and you can remove subsidy too quickly and we’ve seen that in things like the UK onshore wind and solar, where you basically, and Spain as well, solar, where you have huge build-out and then nothing prepared of yours, but in other markets like on, I think probably the best example is, is UK offshore wind, where the subsidy sort of switched to a market based mechanism where bidding got quite aggressive and prices have just plummeted. And the rate of growth is just continuing to increase. And that’s, I think probably been a good example of a slow withdrawal of subsidy, but in a way that’s allowed the market to continue to accelerate.

Jon Powers:

Yeah, well it’s interesting. I mean, as a former policy maker, I mean, when I decided to transition into the finance space, it was when I was working in the White House and seeing that all these initiatives were moving forward on…I was overseeing what the federal government was doing in terms of a large scale PPA’s and I was the chief sustainability officer for the federal agencies. So we do a lot of third party finance contracts, and it really became very clear to me that not many of my colleagues in the policy space, which included me at the time understood finance at all. Right. So the idea that you could actually, at some point, remove those policies on, at least the market, it was speaking Chinese to folks and we really worked on educating folks on, what are some of the marketing mechanisms that could help unleash this. And I feel like that’s sort of the next…it’s interesting, because now we’re sort of facing what we face in 2008, 2009 was another recovery act initiative coming forward. We’ll see probably more interesting policies moving forward, but at what point do we start to move those out of the way and just continue to let the market address the growth here.

Chris Archer:

Yeah and it’s simple to say that you can, you start the subsidy and then you stop subsidy and the market runs away from itself because what’s going to happen next is going to be a new challenge, whether it’s storage or interconnection capacity or whatever that might be, that will slow the growth again. And that’s the point of which you need policy to intervene and provide the right pricing mechanisms, I guess, to enable in development and investment in areas that need it to keep the rate of growth going. So it’s not, it’s obviously not a simple…if it was simple all governments would do it well. It’s obviously not simple. I’ve certainly…if you look back over the next 10 years, you can clearly see where policies have been really effective, where areas of being over subsidized and Spanish solos probably is a great example of pre-crisis aware of where subsidy has been removed too early and we’ve seen that in certain parts of the UK market. So yeah, that balance is really important.

Jon Powers:

So I want to get to Macquarie deeply here in a second, but just because you have a unique…you having worked in Europe most of our audiences is US-based and sort of knows the domestic US market, but when you transitioned from focus in the UK and focusing in Europe to now focusing in North America, what were some of the big, biggest challenges or hurdles that you had sort of coming into that new space or were they very much similar markets just with different challenges?

Chris Archer:

I think there’s a lot of similarities. I think what’s interesting about the US market is not one market. It’s really multiple markets and I think because of the EU, Europe has sort of imposed a market structure on most countries in Europe. And so there’s actually less differences between the market structures of sort of supply transmission, distribution, generation across Europe, in different countries, even though everyone speaks different languages, and has different cultures that that market structure for, for energy is actually quite uniform and it changes, but it’s relatively uniform. Whereas, in the US you have real extremes. So you have somewhere like the Alcott market, which is in many ways, an even more sort of competitive market than the Europeans have been trying to create. And then you’ll have, you’ll have markets like parts of the Southeast, for example, where they’re really just fully vertically integrated and there’s no competition.

Chris Archer:

And the whole…things are very, very different. So I think that’s probably one difference in the US and that’s one of the really interesting things about working here. The other one is, and the biggest one really is the tax equity market. That method of rather than having a revenue stream where you can, as a financier, you can spend quite a lot of time optimizing what sources capital to bring in. And money dollars are totally fungible. Unfortunately, tax credits are not totally fungible. And in fact, that regulation prevents them from being fairly fungible. So that really restricts the sort of financial innovation and actually leads to US renewable products having a much higher cost of capital than they should do because

Jon Powers:

If you could press the reset button on that right now here in the US would you prefer the sort of European structure where you have those different revenue streams versus the tax equity? It’s always a stock right on a lot of these deals.

Chris Archer:

Yeah I mean, for sure it’s a much more, it might look worse from a policy makers kind of balance sheet perspective, but that’s the kind of, that’s only cause you’re hiding the problem of the policy makers balance sheet. It’s a much less efficient way to subsidize renewables. It’s just that you see the cold, hard numbers of subsidy on your ledger as a policymaker versus tax equity, where you can pretend it doesn’t exist, but for going revenue it’s exactly the same as paying a cost and ultimately it’s a less efficient way for projects to be subsidized because senior debt prices or whatever it is, you’re probably sub 3% right now, tax equity still prices are around 7% and basically they’ve taken similar risks once the once the lawyers have the finished with the cutting the tax equity into the most protective piece of capital infrastructure.

Chris Archer:

So there’s definitely an inefficiency so you definitely reset that if you could, especially from a financiers’ perspective or at least someone who’s an investor, as well as you’ve been trying to always find the cheapest source of capital. And then I guess the final difference and I think that the thing that I find most exciting about the US market is…and it’s actually the argument against what I’ve just said, but because the tax equity market has always demanded that the projects seek effectively a revenue stream like a PPA. And when you’re up there, the sort of PPA almost was provided by the government.

Chris Archer:

And so there wasn’t that need for the developer to go and find a revenue stream in order to secure the subsidy in the US you need to find a revenue stream in order to get to secure the subsidy and the tax equity investor. And because the US developers has had to, and the US market has had always the US PPA market in particular, the corporate PPA market is far more advanced than in Europe. Now I think Europe is starting to catch up now, catch up and starting to get on the same path as the US and with corporates actually, and a lot of projects being sort of underwritten the fact that you’re having that revenue under written by PPAs, particularly corporate PPAs, but the US is well ahead of Europe from that perspective.

Chris Archer:

And for me, that’s super exciting because I really…one of the reasons I moved away from big government infrastructure projects towards renewables was the renewables market was at that time a bit more entrepreneurial and a bit more driven by market forces. And it’s exciting that being in the US really feels like you are building projects for a market need, and there’s a market demand that you’re challenged to be able to deliver projects below the alternative cost of supply. And we’re at that tipping point now in 70 markets, that you really feel that it’s sort of acceleration and excitement of working in a market, that’s supplying something that people want at a price that’s more attractive than they can get it from elsewhere.

Jon Powers:

I feel like it’s those corporate players today who are making dramatic levels of influence on policy at the state level where a lot of this work is being done. When Amazon or Microsoft comes, instead of, we want to build a warehouse or a data center in your state, until we can get clean power, you see shifts that happen in places like Virginia, where it was like trying to roll a boulder up the hill up until they came in and helped unleash some of the really positive gains we’re seeing there.

Chris Archer:

They’re also behind a lot of these regulated utilities, procuring power. I mean this sort of voluntary procurement by utilities is sort of not, it’s kind of semi voluntary.

Jon Powers:

That’s right.

Chris Archer:

It’s responding to a demand for their customers saying go out and buy renewable wrappers so a lot of the PPA’s we’ve signed recently have been utilities procuring on behalf of corporates. The impact of that corporate demand is just enormous at that moment in the market.

Jon Powers:

What would be helpful, I think folks are familiar with Macquarie as sort of a large investor advisor, but can you talk a little bit about some of the different projects that you’ve worked on or are working on with the Green Investment Group?

Chris Archer:

I guess since we’ve been branded the Green Investment Group, we’ve been active across wind in the US at least, across onshore wind, solar and battery storage. One of the first projects we closed and really was up one project we closed around and was part of launching the brand was pretty standard in some ways, but on shore wind project in Texas, which actually had been part of the development portfolio that we’d acquired a few years back and it was an area of Texas where the prices of turbines and things you needed to get them to a point, and you need to get the PPA to the right point to make the project work. And that happened in 2018 and we got that project closed.

Chris Archer:

We also, around the same time, were in our sort of second round of financing and building out a big portfolio of battery storage projects behind the meter battery storage projects in California in partnership with AMS. So that in the end that portfolio now 340 megawatt hours of battery storage projects spread across somewhere between 90 and 100 different sites at large CNI was with large CNI customers. So the projects are on a sort of availability based contract with Southern California Edison, which really underwrites the financing. And that’s a 10 year contract and then the batteries are also able to provide some sort of demand response and sort of peak shaving services for their host customers. So the size on which they’re based during the availability period with SE cause there’s some spare capacity. And then beyond that 10 years, those batteries will be operating in a merchant market or we’ll recontract. And that was, for us, that was a fascinating project because certainly Alpha’s experience of deploying batteries with that kind of scale, and then doing that in this market, the West LA basin, which is a very constrained

Jon Powers:

Yeah, that’s fascinating.

Chris Archer:

So that was a really interesting projects, interesting to work with AMS so at the same time, we’re developing the software to really be able to control those batteries and respond to post contractual requirement from Southern California Edison, but also market opportunities around demand response and peak shaving. So that was a big learning experience. And we were also lucky to sort of take it through two rounds of debt financing. And so the first time we took it to market with the banks and the second time was to get to market for the banks. We saw this and the exciting thing about working in the spaces you sort of educate the market and the second time around everyone feels like they missed out the first time around and pricing falls dramatically and things. So that was a fascinating project.

Chris Archer:

I think our only challenge at the moment with battery project is its just hard to find projects which have… I think utilities are still learning how batteries work and how best to contract them and so there’s just a shortage of projects with solid off take contract from utilities and there’s limited ways to monetize them in the emergent markets and a lot of places. So that’s the challenge we’re seeing. We probably thought when we started doing that original financing back in 2016, that we’d be doing gigawatts of battery storage projects now, and that’s just not materialized in the way that we’d expected. The market’s just been a bit slow.

Jon Powers:

It’s funny you said that because I feel we’ve been looking pretty heavily at storage as well. And it’s not only a state by state game right now, but there’s still so many nascent, there’s only so many nascent opportunities and people are not yet comfortable to really scale it up. First of all that project sounds really fascinating and as a case study right? Looking at it and stepping back and saying, okay, if we need to go to a trillion dollars a year in new, renewable energy capacity investment over the next decade to help keep our climate goals where the Paris Agreement is what are some of the missing pieces then that can help unleash the more of their capital into those types of projects? Because there’s those type of projects that will help us stabilize the grid with renewables, really scale up the last decades worth of work here. So if there’s any magic wand that you had to fix some of these missing puzzle pieces, what would you do?

Chris Archer:

It’s not an easy question. I think that the biggest barrier at the moment, especially to things like battery storage, is that the financing, the people who understand the technology, the people who really understand the value of that asset and where that actually should be and where it can be most valuable and sort of policy makers and regulators are all kind of separated today. And it’s really hard for everyone. I think if you, if everyone can understand what AMS and Southern California Edison did in the West LA basin and the value of that to Southern California as a sermon, what I meant in terms of reduced investment in to the distribution upgrades and stability on the grid and how that meant that they could put more renewables on the system with less stability impacts.

Chris Archer:

I think if everyone understood that and could explain that, and then could develop a model to incentivize people to go and develop more projects like that, and to pay for them, then you’d have this huge number of battery storage projects that would kind of pencil. But at the moment, SCE who actually has all these batteries sped around one of his most congested areas is probably still learning the benefit of those and what the value of having that infrastructure is in their system. Then they’d have to explain it to other utilities of different systems so I think that’s probably the biggest wave, the magic wand. It would be to say that we all are equipped with this very simple mechanism whereby a developer, a utility and a regulator can all understand when it’s better to put a battery somewhere, really what the impact of putting a solar project on the system and this place is and how that compares to how things have been done previously.

Chris Archer:

I think the whole power system is so entrenched in terms of this idea of being very large generators and very large wires, then take the power to distribution that works. The idea of having batteries in that distribution network or having small generators distributing, or generating power which you can’t control. It just seems like a problem that should be avoided I think for most people. Who’ve been in the power market for a long time, rather than being seen as kind of this opportunity to completely be relative to that. It’s super hard, I think, but I think if you were to wave that magic wand, it would be to give everyone that understanding of the benefits and how to, and how to price them. I truly believe that the problem at the moment is that especially in battery storage, which is one of the big barriers to deploy the more renewables, in some cases, especially in Metro stores at the moment, the people who are developing and building projects and investing in projects, don’t actually understand the benefit or the full benefit they’re creating and they certainly can’t monetize a lot of that benefit. On the other side, the people who are receiving that benefit don’t really understand the capabilities of the storage system and developers and the cost of financing it. So it’s pretty hard for the two to sort of meet in the middle.

Jon Powers:

Interesting. I mean, Chris, first of all, I just applaud the work you guys are doing at Macquarie and really trying to solve these complex problems. I think the example, the case study, you showed of one of the projects you’re working on really highlights that a lot of folks just aren’t willing to touch that yet. The fact that you were working on it for years to get it to work and are getting that deployed is phenomenal. We’re going to need more of that to really get through what I think, what you call it before we discussed, or before we got online, you called the decisive decade. To really get where we need to be 2030 and beyond it’s going to take that type of creativity and that type of understanding from investors, not just policy makers and utilities, but from investors to continue to scale this up. So thank you for the incredible work you guys are doing.

Chris Archer:

Thanks very much. We’d love to do more of it.

Jon Powers:

Absolutely. I’d love to find ways to work with you guys too. One thing I always ask all of my interviewees is if you could go back to yourself when you were heading off to university, or maybe even coming out of university and you could sit down and grab a beer, what piece of career advice would you give yourself?

Chris Archer:

I was at university at the same time as Mark Zuckerberg so probably head to Stanford and made friends with Mark and join Facebook or join. I think my peers seem to have created the world’s the world’s largest fund technology firms though. Aside from that, which was a particular period that I lived through at the university…I think the two things that for me are important is find things that sort of interests you or steal your curiosity and then and be honest about what that is. Not what you should like or whatever. I think curiosity is super important. Then go and find a group of kind of likeminded people that you get on with, which I think is super important. That’s what I’ve certainly found at Macquarie. Be prepared to really throw yourself into things and work hard because I’ve certainly found that having that curiosity and that interest in working with a bunch of like minded people that are interesting, intelligent and share that curiosity means that you can work pretty hard.

Chris Archer:

I think I was reading some liquor, can’t remember it was but Jamie Diamond’s only piece of career advice to people was work hard. [Sort of an investment banking M and A view of the world. I think for me if you’re working with fun people and interesting people, when you’ve got a lot of curiosity, then the hard work doesn’t feel like hard work, I guess.

Jon Powers:

Yeah., I agree.

Chris Archer:

Yeah, for me, that would be the advice I’d give to others. And I guess give to myself.

Jon Powers:

Well, Chris, thank you so much for joining us at Expert Only.

Chris Archer:

Thanks very much. Good to chat.

Jon Powers:

Yeah, absolutely. You got a fascinating background. You guys continue to do great work. I want to thank the team at Macquarie for helping to put this together and to thank our producer, Carly Battin for as always the hard work she does. You can get more episodes at CleanCapital.com. Please feel free to submit folks you think we should be talking to. And as always, I look forward to continuing the conversation.
[/av_textblock]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ icon_select=’yes’ icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ position=’center’ shadow=’no-shadow’ height=’40’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ custom_border_color=” custom_icon_color=” id=” custom_class=” av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_social_share title=’Share this entry’ style=” buttons=” share_facebook=” share_twitter=” share_pinterest=” share_gplus=” share_reddit=” share_linkedin=” share_tumblr=” share_vk=” share_mail=” av-desktop-hide=” av-medium-hide=” av-small-hide=” av-mini-hide=” av_uid=’av-354olk’]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_button label=’More Podcasts’ link=’page,5266′ link_target=” size=’small’ position=’center’ label_display=” icon_select=’no’ icon=’ue800′ font=’entypo-fontello’ color=’theme-color’ custom_bg=’#444444′ custom_font=’#ffffff’ av_uid=’av-jx1x7jx3′ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]

[av_hr class=’invisible’ height=’40’ shadow=’no-shadow’ position=’center’ custom_border=’av-border-thin’ custom_width=’50px’ custom_border_color=” custom_margin_top=’30px’ custom_margin_bottom=’30px’ icon_select=’yes’ custom_icon_color=” icon=’ue808′ font=’entypo-fontello’ av_uid=’av-jwwgzkyu’ custom_class=” admin_preview_bg=”]